Building Provably Safe Systems for AGI

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 10,030 words - view

The Importance of Provably Safe Systems

---

• Building provably safe systems for AGIs is important to ensure control and prevent potential harm.

• Provably safe systems can counteract risks such as bioterrorism and rogue AI.

• Using AI for formal verification and mechanistic interpretability can help achieve provably safe systems.

• Visual: Image of a secure lock symbolizing safety and control.

Formal Verification and Mechanistic Interpretability

---

• Developing large databases of machine-readable theorems and proofs is crucial for formal verification.

• Multiple sensors and a formal framework are needed to enhance the reliability of sensor information in physical systems.

• Visual: Diagram illustrating the process of formal verification.

AI's Potential in Theorem Proving and Verification

---

• AI has the potential to surpass human ability in automated theorem proving and formal verification.

• Deep learning theorem networks can revolutionize exponential search problems.

• Visual: Graph showing the improvement of AI in theorem proving compared to human performance.

Securing Fundamental Components and Privacy Protocols

---

• The importance of securing fundamental components like ssh Secure Shell and the bash Linux shell is highlighted.

• Formal verification of blockchain systems, such as Ethereum, is making progress but not yet complete.

• Securing privacy protocols is crucial for AI safety.

• Visual: Image representing cybersecurity and data protection.

Creating a Provably Safe Infrastructure for AGI

---

• Creating a provably safe infrastructure for AGI is crucial to avoid existential risks.

• Gödel’s Completeness Theorem emphasizes the need for safety properties with proofs.

• Visual: Illustration depicting a safe infrastructure protecting AGI from potential risks.

Ensuring Safety and Control for AGI

---

• The development of provably safe systems is essential to maintain control over AGIs and prevent harm.

• Remember the importance of formal verification, mechanistic interpretability, and securing fundamental components and privacy protocols.

• Let’s work together to build a provably safe infrastructure for AGI.

Auto-Regressive Next-Token Predictors: A Theoretical Framework

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 8,770 words - view

Introduction

---

• Auto-Regressive Next-Token Predictors (ARNPs) excel in logical and mathematical reasoning.

• Learning complexity is measured by “length complexity” which counts intermediate tokens.

• ARNPs have the potential to approximate any function computed by a model.

Investigating Simple Models

---

• Simple models like linear predictors and small MLPs can solve complex tasks.

• Theoretical work highlights the importance of studying these models.

• Linear decoder classes can be efficiently learned in the auto-regressive setting.

Approximating Functions

---

• Auto-regressive learning can approximate functions computed by underlying AR functions.

• Linear AR functions can approximate linear threshold circuits.

• Any Turing computable function can be computed by a linear threshold circuit.

Efficient Learning of Parities

---

• Learning parities is a computationally hard problem.

• Linear AR models can efficiently compute any parity function with a small length complexity.

• O(log n) length complexity makes learning parities efficiently learnable.

Auto-Regressive Next-Token Predictors in NLP

---

• ARNPs are used in natural language processing models.

• Components include masked linear and ReLU layers, input embedding, and output embedding.

• These components contribute to the effectiveness of ARNPs in NLP tasks.

Experimental Validation

---

• Linear models trained auto-regressively perform well in next-token prediction tasks.

• A small MLP achieved comparable performance to a linear AR model in arithmetic computations.

• Training models with custom tokenization and more intermediate steps improved performance.

References

---

• Cited papers and preprints related to auto-regressive next-token predictors.

• Topics include computational complexity and linear dynamical system models for text.

Proofs

---

• Proofs for Theorems 3, 5, 7, and 11 demonstrating the learnability and complexity of ARNPs.

Conclusions

---

• ARNPs are highly skilled in logical and mathematical reasoning.

• Length complexity quantifies the intermediate tokens required for learning concepts.

• Linear AR functions can approximate linear threshold circuits and Turing computable functions.

• Learning parities becomes efficiently learnable with a small length complexity.

• Auto-regressive next-token predictors are vital components in natural language processing models.

---

[Visuals could include graphs illustrating performance comparisons or diagrams of the components in NLP models]

Efficient Fine-Tuning with Long Context Sizes

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 9,854 words - view

Introduction

---

• LongLoRA extends context sizes of pre-trained language models efficiently

• Sparse local attention and position embedding methods are used

• Speeds up context extension without high computation cost

Fine-Tuning with S2-Attn

---

• Models fine-tuned with S2-Attn retain original attention architecture

• Compatibility with existing optimization techniques and infrastructure

• FlashAttention-2 is compatible with our method

Visual: Comparison of attention architecture

Position Embedding Methods

---

• Position Interpolation, NTK-aware, Yarn, positional Skipping, and out-of-distribution related methods are used

• Extend long contexts in language models

Visual: Examples of different position embedding methods

Impact of Fine-Tuning

---

• Models without fine-tuning perform worse as context length increases

• Even with position embeddings, fine-tuning is crucial for good quality

• Baseline model trained and tested with full attention and fine-tuning shows consistent quality across context lengths

Experiments and Results

---

• Extended pre-trained LLaMA2 models with long context sizes

• Maximum extended context window sizes up to 100k, 65536, and 32768

• Comparable performance to state-of-the-art model in retrieving topics from long conversations

• Ablation study shows full fine-tuning converges faster

References to Related Papers

---

• Layer normalization, long-document transformers, recurrent memory transformers, extending context window of language models

• Papers from conferences such as ICLR, EMNLP, ICCV, and NeurIPS

Visual: Collage of paper covers

More References to Papers and Resources

---

• Compressive transformers, Deepspeed, Roformer, Training neural networks with fixed sparse masks, Mosaic

• Further reading and resources for efficient fine-tuning with long context sizes

Evaluation Results

---

• Evaluation results on the PG19 test split

• Using the same training settings as models in Table 4 and Table 5

• Models achieve better perplexity as evaluation context length increases

Visual: Graph showing perplexity improvement

Monkey's Growth in Journey

---

• Monkey initially uses tricks and threats, but shows signs of wisdom and growth

• Explains deeper meaning behind lunar cycle to Sanzang

• Takes the lead in protecting Sanzang from demons

Snape's Treatment of Harry

---

• Snape’s unfair treatment attributed to resentment towards Harry’s fame and attention

• Past history with Harry’s father influences Snape’s behavior

Visual: Images of Harry and Snape

Key Takeaways

---

• LongLoRA efficiently extends context sizes in pre-trained language models

• Fine-tuning with S2-Attn retains original attention architecture

• Position embedding methods are used to extend long contexts

• Fine-tuning is crucial for good quality as context length increases

• The model achieves comparable performance to the state-of-the-art

• Evaluation results show improved perplexity with longer context lengths

• Remember the importance of efficient fine-tuning for long context sizes

Rehearsal Simulating Conflict for Conflict Resolution Training

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 14,654 words - view

Introduction to Rehearsal

---

• Rehearsal is a system developed by Stanford University for simulating conflicts and practicing conflict resolution skills.

• It utilizes the Interests-Rights-Power (IRP) framework to categorize conflict resolution strategies.

• IRP prompting generates conflict scenarios and message alternatives based on constructive and destructive strategies.

IRP Framework for Conflict Resolution

---

• The IRP framework categorizes conflict resolution strategies into eight higher-level categories.

• It provides a structured approach to simulate conflict and train individuals in resolving conflicts effectively.

• The framework helps users understand the different dimensions of conflicts and choose appropriate strategies.

IRP Prompting in Rehearsal

---

• Rehearsal utilizes IRP prompting, which grounds language model generations to conflict resolution theory.

• It generates conflict scenarios and message alternatives based on constructive and destructive strategies.

• IRP prompting helps users practice recognizing and applying conflict resolution strategies in simulated scenarios.

Large Language Models in Conflict Simulation

---

• Rehearsal uses large language models (LLMs) to simulate conflict scenarios for training purposes.

• LLMs have been successfully used in various tasks, such as generating text completions and simulating human behaviors.

• The use of LLMs in Rehearsal enhances the realism and effectiveness of conflict resolution training.

Turning Conflicts into Cooperation

---

• Rehearsal emphasizes that cooperation can arise from productive conflict.

• It aims to help individuals learn how to turn conflicts into opportunities for cooperation and positive outcomes.

• By practicing conflict resolution skills through simulated scenarios, users can develop the ability to navigate conflicts effectively.

In-Context Guidance in Rehearsal

---

• Rehearsal provides users with in-context guidance during conflict resolution simulations.

• The system offers prompts and suggestions to help users make informed decisions and choose appropriate strategies.

• In-context guidance enhances the learning experience and supports users in developing their conflict resolution skills.

Evaluation of Rehearsal

---

• Participants in the Rehearsal condition performed better than those in the control condition, although the differences were not statistically significant.

• The evaluation showed that Rehearsal can effectively improve individuals’ performance in conflict resolution.

• Simulations like Rehearsal prioritize practical application over memorization, making them beneficial for conflict resolution training.

Key Takeaways

---

• Rehearsal is a system developed by Stanford University for simulating conflicts and practicing conflict resolution skills.

• The Interests-Rights-Power (IRP) framework categorizes conflict resolution strategies in Rehearsal.

• IRP prompting generates conflict scenarios and message alternatives based on constructive and destructive strategies.

• Rehearsal utilizes large language models (LLMs) to simulate conflict scenarios and teach conflict resolution strategies.

• It aims to help individuals turn conflicts into opportunities for cooperation and provides in-context guidance.

• Evaluation results showed that Rehearsal can effectively improve participants’ performance in conflict resolution.

---

Note: Visuals such as graphs, images, or charts could be added to illustrate the concepts and enhance the presentation.

BTLM-3B-8K: A State-of-the-Art Language Model

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 12,329 words - view

Introduction

---

• BTLM-3B-8K is a high-performing 3 billion parameter language model.

• It outperforms existing models and is competitive with some 7 billion parameter models.

• Incorporates ALiBi position embeddings and maximal update parameterization techniques.

Impressive Performance

---

• BTLM-3B-8K demonstrates stability during training.

• Achieves excellent long context performance.

• Requires less computational resources compared to other models.

Model Specifications

---

• Model shape: d model = 2560, n layers = 32, d head = 80, d f [visual: diagram of model shape]

• Incorporates ALiBi position embeddings and maximal update parameterization techniques.

Training Process

---

• Trained on the Condor Galaxy 1 AI supercomputer using data parallelism.

• Maximal update parameterization contributes to stability during training.

Visual: Image of Condor Galaxy 1 AI supercomputer

Superior Performance in Common Sense Reasoning

---

• Table 3 shows higher accuracy and less computational resources compared to other 3 billion parameter models.

• BTLM-3B outperforms in common sense reasoning tasks.

• Significant accuracy improvements in reading comprehension tasks.

Outperforming Other Models

---

• Table 5 demonstrates BTLM-3B-8K’s superior performance on coding benchmarks.

• Excels in evaluation of long context capability.

• Reliable outputs in TruthfulQA and WinoGender tasks.

Enhanced Performance Techniques

---

• Increasing the learning rate decay ratio in higher TPP settings encourages improved performance.

• BTLM-3B-8K outperforms some 7 billion parameter models with only 40% of the inference compute.

• Compatible with devices with 3GB capacity.

Implementation Infrastructure

---

• Utilizes G42’s Condor Galaxy-1 AI Supercomputer in Santa Clara, California.

Visual: Image of G42's Condor Galaxy-1 AI Supercomputer

• Trained using PyTorch.

Model Card and Training Dataset

---

• Model card follows guidelines from Mitchell et al. (2019).

• Training dataset includes benchmark datasets and research papers.

• References various resources related to language models and training datasets.

Conclusion

---

• BTLM-3B-8K is a state-of-the-art language model with impressive performance.

• Incorporates ALiBi position embeddings and maximal update parameterization techniques.

• Trained on the Condor Galaxy 1 AI supercomputer using data parallelism.

• Outperforms existing models in various tasks.

• Utilizes G42’s Condor Galaxy-1 AI Supercomputer for implementation.

• Model card follows guidelines from Mitchell et al. (2019) and references relevant research papers.

Key Takeaways

---

• BTLM-3B-8K is a high-performing 3 billion parameter language model.

• Incorporates ALiBi position embeddings and maximal update parameterization techniques.

• Achieves stability during training and outperforms existing models.

• Utilizes the Condor Galaxy 1 AI supercomputer for training and implementation.

• References relevant research papers and follows model card guidelines.

---

[Note: The presentation can be enhanced with relevant visuals, such as diagrams, images, or charts, to support the main points.]