Welcome to another round-up of cutting-edge research from Arxiv, where we delve into the robustness of code generation by large language models, explore the potential of PMET in enhancing LLMs, and grapple with the challenge of answering ambiguous questions. We’ll also take you on a journey into the never-ending learning of user interfaces and ponder over the concept of digital social contracts for an egalitarian digital society. As always, we’ll be incorporating the lively discussions from Hacker News to bring you diverse perspectives. From debates over analysis methodology in code generation to discussions on the static versus dynamic UI debate, there’s plenty to pique your curiosity. Let’s dive in.
Top Papers
1) Robustness and Reliability of Large Language Model Code Generation
Summary:
The text discusses the reliability and robustness of code generated by large language models using a benchmark of coding questions and an abstract syntax tree evaluator.
View PDF | Chat with this paper
Copy slides outline
Copy embed code
Download as Word
Robustness and Reliability of Large Language Model Code Generation
Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 6,974 words - view
Introduction
• Large language models (LLMs) are popular for coding help but their reliability and robustness have not been thoroughly studied.
• The misuse of APIs in the generated code can lead to various issues.
• A benchmark has been proposed to evaluate the reliability and robustness of code generated by LLMs, using a dataset from Stack Overflow and an evaluator based on abstract syntax trees (AST).
Previous Studies on Code Quality
• Previous studies have highlighted issues in code quality from online forums, such as compilation errors, deprecated APIs, and security risks.
• These studies emphasize the need for evaluating the reliability and robustness of LLM-generated code.
• Visual: Graph showing the frequency of different code quality issues in previous studies.
Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code
• The evaluation of LLM-generated code focuses on its robustness and reliability.
• Experiments are conducted to answer research questions about API misuse.
• Visual: Chart comparing the performance of different LLMs on the ROBUST API.
Static Analysis for Full Coverage
• Testing the reliability and robustness of code is challenging, as high-coverage test cases only cover semantic correctness.
• Static analysis is used to analyze code misuse by its structure, providing full coverage beyond semantic correctness.
• Visual: Diagram illustrating the process of static analysis for code misuse detection.
Performance and Misuse Rate of LLMs
• The text discusses the performance and misuse rate of LLMs in generating code.
• Lower values on the ROBUST API indicate better performance.
• Visual: Table showing the performance of different LLMs on the ROBUST API.
Evaluating Robustness and Reliability
• Several studies have evaluated the robustness and reliability of LLMs for code generation.
• Assessments of correctness and benchmark datasets have been used in these studies.
• Visual: Image showcasing the results of a correctness assessment for LLM-generated code.
Checking API Usage Patterns
• The document discusses the API usage patterns checked in the ROBUST API.
• These patterns are based on existing research on API misuses.
• Visual: Examples of API usage patterns checked in the ROBUST API.
Key Takeaways
• Large language models (LLMs) are popular for coding help, but their reliability and robustness need further evaluation.
• A benchmark using a dataset from Stack Overflow and an abstract syntax tree (AST) evaluator has been proposed.
• Previous studies have highlighted code quality issues, emphasizing the need for evaluating LLM-generated code.
• Static analysis provides full coverage beyond semantic correctness to analyze code misuse.
• Evaluations focus on robustness, reliability, performance, and misuse rate of LLM-generated code.
• Several studies have assessed the robustness and reliability of LLMs, including correctness assessments and benchmark datasets.
• The ROBUST API checks API usage patterns based on existing research on API misuses.
Hacker News:
The robustness and reliability of large language model code generation is being debated on Hacker News, with some users questioning the analysis methodology. View on HN
- Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Copilot are being discussed in terms of their robustness and reliability in code generation.
- There are concerns about the accuracy and reliability of generated code by LLMs, with some users finding them unreliable and time-wasting.
- LLMs can be useful for generating initial text and transforming text into different forms, but they struggle with complex or difficult tasks and may provide misleading or unhelpful answers.
- The age of AI in coding started with the release of Copilot and ChatGPT 4, which are considered competent versions for coding tasks.
- LLMs are comparable to mid-level developers in terms of writing and explaining code, but they still make mistakes and have limitations.
2) PMET Precise Model Editing in a Transformer
Summary:
PMET is a method that enhances LLMs by optimizing hidden states of MHSA and FFN components in Transformers, introducing a subject-centric model.
View PDF | Chat with this paper
Copy slides outline
Copy embed code
Download as Word
Enhancing Large Language Models with PMET
Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 8,417 words - view
Introduction to PMET
• PMET is a model editing technique for Large Language Models (LLMs)
• Aims to modify a minor proportion of knowledge in LLMs at a relatively low cost
• Optimizes the TC hidden states of both MHSA and FFN in Transformers
• Introduces a subject-centric approach to model editing
The Concept of Edited Knowledge
• PMET proposes the concept of edited knowledge associated with the subject
• Enables models to reason based on the subject
• Redefines the model editing problem
• Analyzes the role of subject-related knowledge
Optimizing Hidden States with PMET
• PMET introduces optimized parameters to the hidden states of the model at each layer
• Utilizes a square root spread for conveying precise information
• Enhances critical layers with more accurate insights
• Experiments conducted on GPT-J (6B) and GPT-NeoX
Performance Comparison with Other Methods
• PMET outperforms other methods such as MEMIT and MEND
• Evaluates reliability, specificity, fluency, and consistency in model editing
• Provides superior results in terms of reliability and specificity
• Ensures edited models maintain fluency and consistency
Evaluating Success in Model Editing
• Assessing success on all target knowledge is challenging
• Previous works divided reliability into efficacy and generalization
• Evaluates success on edit sequences and paraphrasing
• PMET improves reliability and specificity in model editing
Related Studies and References
• References to studies related to knowledge editing in language models
• Covers topics such as inspecting and editing knowledge representations
• Explores hallucination in natural language generation and language models as knowledge bases
• Discusses contextualization in masked language models
Summary of PMET
• PMET is a powerful model editing technique for LLMs
• Optimizes hidden states to modify knowledge at a low cost
• Introduces subject-centric approach for better reasoning
• Outperforms other methods in reliability, specificity, fluency, and consistency
• PMET enhances the capabilities of Large Language Models
[Visuals can be added to slides as relevant, such as graphs or charts illustrating performance comparisons or optimized parameters in PMET]
Hacker News:
The paper “PMET: Precise Model Editing in a Transformer” discusses the challenge and current limitations of incrementally updating language models without compromising performance. View on HN
- PMET (Precise Model Editing in a Transformer) is a research paper that discusses the ability to update and edit language models (LLMs) incrementally.
- Meng et al 2022 is recommended reading to understand the PMET paper.
- Yannic conducted an interview with the authors of the PMET paper.
- The PMET research has implications for government/court mandated changes, censoring, and edits to models.
- One of the challenges with LLMs is keeping them updated and relevant over time.
- The ability to update LLMs incrementally without compromising performance is crucial.
- The PMET research suggests a potential path towards achieving incremental updates for LLMs.
- Document vectors and similarity search methods can be used to save and search for similar documents.
3) Answering Ambiguous Questions with a Database
Summary:
Developing virtual knowledge bases is a solution to address the challenge of answering ambiguous questions in open-domain question answering.
View PDF | Chat with this paper
Copy slides outline
Copy embed code
Download as Word
Answering Ambiguous Questions with a Database
Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 6,666 words - view
Introduction
• Answering ambiguous questions is a challenging task in open-domain question answering.
• Current state-of-the-art method uses a database of unambiguous questions generated from Wikipedia to improve performance.
• Virtual knowledge bases have been proposed to address the limitations of traditional knowledge bases.
Three-stage Process
• A three-stage process is described for answering ambiguous questions using a database.
• Stage 1: Retrieving questions from a database using retrieval models like BM25 and GTR.
• Stage 2: Merging spans to generate answers from passages.
• Stage 3: Question revisions to improve answer generation.
Retrieval Models
• Retrieval models like BM25 and GTR are used to encode and retrieve questions from the database.
• Questions from SIXPAQ are mapped to the passages they were generated from.
• Indirect retrieval with SIXPAQ outperforms BM25 and GTR in passage-based retrieval.
Question Revisions
• Question revisions are generated by moving information from passages to questions.
• T5-large model is used for this task.
• The revision process is repeated multiple times to improve answer quality.
Popular Retrieval Methods
• DPR and GTR-large are popular retrieval methods for question-based and passage retrieval.
• DPR is effective for question-based retrieval.
• GTR-large performs well in passage retrieval.
Effectiveness of Using a Database
• The effectiveness of using a database to answer ambiguous questions is discussed.
• Approaches to increase information coverage are explored.
• Retrieving from generated questions can improve the diversity of retrieval results.
Performance Evaluation
• The performance of long-form answer generation using retrieved answers and passages is evaluated.
• STR-EM and DISAMBIG-F1 decrease as the number of passages increases.
• Adding questions from SIXPAQ improves the performance.
Conclusion
• Answering ambiguous questions is a challenging task.
• Using a database of unambiguous questions can improve performance.
• Virtual knowledge bases offer a solution to the limitations of traditional knowledge bases.
Key Takeaways
• Answering ambiguous questions is challenging but can be improved with a database.
• Retrieval models like BM25 and GTR are effective in retrieving questions.
• Question revisions and popular retrieval methods enhance answer generation.
• Using a database can increase the diversity of retrieval results and improve performance.
[Visuals could include graphs showing performance improvement, comparison charts, or images representing virtual knowledge bases]
Note: The presentation should have a total of 8 slides, excluding the closing slide.
4) Never-ending Learning of User Interfaces
Summary:
The Never-ending UI Learner is an automated system that learns about user interfaces by installing and exploring real apps, with a focus on challenging elements like tappability and dragging, using a coordinator-worker architecture.
View PDF | Chat with this paper
Copy slides outline
Copy embed code
Download as Word
Never-ending Learning of User Interfaces
Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 11,564 words - view
Introduction
• The Never-ending UI Learner is an automated system that learns about user interfaces by installing and exploring real apps.
• It focuses on challenging elements like tappability and dragging.
• The system uses a coordinator-worker architecture.
App Crawling and UI Inference
• The Never-ending UI Learner automatically installs real apps from a mobile app store and crawls them to infer semantic properties of user interfaces (UIs).
• It interacts with UI elements to discover new training examples.
• Machine learning is continually updated based on the crawled data.
Crawling Publicly Available Apps
• The system uses a coordinator-worker architecture to download and crawl publicly available apps.
• The coordinator server maintains a list of app IDs to crawl and tracks successful and unsuccessful crawls.
• Crawler workers download and install target apps for analysis.
Understanding UI Content
• The crawler contains screen-level and element-level models to understand UI content.
• Semantic representations of user interfaces are generated.
• These models help in analyzing and categorizing UI elements.
Performance Evaluation
• The performance of the crawler was evaluated over five crawl epochs.
• Three variations of the crawler were tested using different crawling strategies.
• The experiments collected data on the efficiency and effectiveness of the crawler.
Tappability Heuristic
• The tappability heuristic involves taking screenshots before and after a tap to identify visual changes.
• Multiple screenshots are used to reduce false positives.
• The accuracy of the heuristic was validated against human-labeled interaction videos.
Quality of Data
• The model trained on human-annotated data performed poorly when predicting the tappability of elements.
• This suggests that the heuristic-annotated data is of higher quality.
• Human and crawler-generated labels showed disagreement.
Screen Similarity Models
• Screen similarity models have various applications in software engineering.
• They are used for mobile app usage videos, automated software testing, and automated storyboard generation.
• Additional examples of same-screen pairs were mined to augment the training data.
Improved Model Performance
• The baseline model was improved to achieve a higher F1 score.
• The crawler-augmented dataset resulted in further improvements.
• The final F1 score was higher than the initial model.
Retraining Frequency
• Experiments were conducted to study the effects of retraining frequency on UI understanding models.
• Less frequent updates, such as monthly updates, may be beneficial.
• The authors suggest exploring optimal retraining strategies.
Key Takeaways
• The Never-ending UI Learner is an automated system that learns about user interfaces.
• It uses a coordinator-worker architecture to crawl and analyze publicly available apps.
• The system focuses on challenging elements like tappability and dragging.
• Less frequent updates may improve the performance of UI understanding models.
Hacker News:
UX/UI developers create visually engaging interfaces similar to twitch video games, but some users prefer static interfaces to avoid having to learn new designs, leading to the need for instructions often being posted in office settings. View on HN
- UX/UI developers today design interfaces influenced by twitch video games, with constant reflowing elements and surprise popups.
- Anticipating and leading the UI is necessary due to the dynamic nature of modern interfaces.
- Lightweight markup has taken over the document space to reduce overhead costs and improve efficiency.
- Accessible design can help standardize complex problems and fast-track UX testing.
- Frontend barriers to entry are low, resulting in inexperienced web developers making UI mistakes.
- Some major companies prioritize trendy design over user-friendly interfaces.
- Users often resist UI changes and prefer familiarity.
- The evolution of UI, such as flat design, has led to mixed reactions and challenges in usability.
5) Digital Social Contracts A Foundation for an Egalitarian and Just Digital Society
Summary:
The article proposes digital social contracts to establish a just and autonomous digital society based on voluntary agreements.
View PDF | Chat with this paper
Copy slides outline
Copy embed code
Download as Word
Digital Social Contracts: A Foundation for an Egalitarian and Just Digital Society
Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 11,588 words - view
Introduction
• Digital social contracts propose a self-governed and fair society in the digital realm.
• Mark Zuckerberg’s vision for Facebook lacks individual rights and responsibilities.
• Digital social contracts consist of voluntary agreements among individuals in the digital realm.
Agents in Digital Social Contracts
• Agents are connected through reliable communication.
• Agents can perform digital speech acts and receive messages.
• Computational hardness of the public-key system ensures security.
Design of Social Contract Programming Language
• Agents can take actions based on their history and receive actions from others.
• Internal state is used for each agent in the programming language design.
• SCPL includes syntax and rules for input and output.
Potential of Digital Social Contracts
• Digital social contracts have the potential to create a fair and egalitarian digital society.
• They enable individuals to have more control over their digital interactions.
• They promote transparency, accountability, and fairness.
Cooperative Platforms
• A cooperative platform could eliminate the need for middlemen like Airbnb.
• Tourists and room owners can own and operate the platform themselves.
• This empowers individuals and reduces reliance on centralized platforms.
Operational Semantics of SCPL and SCDS
• SCPL defines the transition function, addressed message store, and distributed state configurations.
• SCDS refers to Social Contract with a Distributed State.
• The transition system for SCDS is discussed, including explicit output-nondeterminism and input closure.
Conclusion
• Digital social contracts offer a path towards a more just and egalitarian digital society.
• They provide individuals with greater autonomy and control over their digital interactions.
• It is important to continue exploring and developing the concept of digital social contracts.
Key Takeaways
• Digital social contracts promote fairness, autonomy, and individual rights.
• Cooperative platforms empower individuals and reduce reliance on centralized intermediaries.
• The design of a social contract programming language enables agents to interact and make decisions.
• Digital social contracts have the potential to create a just and egalitarian digital society.
![Robustness and reliability of large language model code generation, PMET in a Transformer, answering ambiguous questions with a database, never-ending learning of user interfaces, digital social contracts: foundation for an egalitarian and just digital society [arXiv Spotlight]](https://sloppy-joe-app.s3.amazonaws.com/www/arxiv.png){kind=small}