Relighting Neural Radiance Fields with Shadow and Highlight Hints

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 9,638 words - view

A Novel Approach to Free Viewpoint Relighting

---

• Introduces a neural implicit radiance representation

• Models both local and global light transport using a multi-layer perceptron

• Overcomes limitations in handling challenging effects for relighting

Visual: Comparison of traditional relighting methods vs. proposed method

Challenges in Relighting Scenes with Challenging Effects

---

• Previous methods limited to diffuse scenes under simplified lighting models

• Difficulties with ill-defined shapes, translucent materials, and specular materials

• Deferred Neural Relighting method can handle challenging scenes

Visual: Examples of scenes with challenging effects

Limitations of the NeRF Model

---

• NeRF model uses voxel grids for object representation

• Memory intensive and struggles to capture fine-scale geometrical details

• Improvements needed for relighting scenes with complex geometry

Visual: Comparison of NeRF model vs. proposed method

Relighting Neural Radiance Fields with Shadow and Highlight Hints

---

• Method proposes incorporating shadow and highlight hints to the radiance network

• Provides more accurate modeling of high-frequency light transport effects

• Enhances the realism and quality of relighting results

Visual: Before and after examples of relighting with shadow and highlight hints

Relightable Radiance MLP for View and Lighting Dependent Light Transport

---

• Introduces a relightable radiance MLP for evaluating light transport at each position

• Takes input from density MLP, SDF-normal, position, view direction, and point light position

• Enables precise control over the relighting process

Visual: Diagram illustrating the relightable radiance MLP

Experimental Setup and Acquisition Process

---

• Scene placed on a checkerboard pattern for camera calibration

• Primary camera: Sony A7II, Secondary camera: iPhone 13 Pro

• Video sequence captured from each camera for relighting

• Random selection of frames for relighting experiments

Visual: Images of the setup and acquisition process

Comparison with Existing Techniques

---

• Proposed method compared to IRON and Neural Radiance Transfer Fields

• Outperforms these techniques in terms of relighting quality and accuracy

• Provides more realistic and visually appealing results

Visual: Side-by-side comparison of relighting results

Conclusion

---

• Novel neural implicit radiance representation for free viewpoint relighting

• Overcomes limitations of previous methods and handles challenging effects

• Incorporates shadow and highlight hints for improved relighting results

• Outperforms existing techniques like IRON and Neural Radiance Transfer Fields

Key Takeaways

---

• A novel neural implicit radiance representation for free viewpoint relighting is proposed

• The method models both local and global light transport using a multi-layer perceptron

• The proposed method outperforms other techniques such as IRON and Neural Radiance Transfer Fields

• Reminder: Enhancing the realism and quality of relighting results with shadow and highlight hints

SoTaNa: The Open-Source Software Development Assistant

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 8,341 words - view

Introduction

---

• SoTaNa is an open-source software development assistant based on ChatGPT and fine-tuning.

• It aims to assist developers with data and code summarization.

• SoTaNa enhances the LLaMA model to provide effective support to developers.

SoTaNa's Capabilities

---

• SoTaNa demonstrates effectiveness in assisting developers through human evaluation.

• It has the ability to summarize and generate code.

• The open-source nature of SoTaNa allows for continuous improvement and community contributions.

Addressing the Challenge of Human-Written Instructions

---

• OpenAI has curated instruct-based datasets to improve understanding of human-written instructions.

• SoTaNa leverages these datasets to enhance its capabilities.

• The model is constantly learning and evolving to better comprehend instructions.

Parameter-Efficient Tuning of Large Language Models

---

• SoTaNa focuses on parameter-efficient tuning of large language models (LLMs).

• The Lora method is used to freeze pre-trained model parameters and introduce trainable low-rank decomposition matrices into each Transformer layer.

• This approach improves the efficiency and effectiveness of the model.

Generating High-Quality Instruction-Based Data

---

• SoTaNa leverages LLMs to generate high-quality instruction-based data for software engineering tasks.

• This data is crucial for improving the model’s understanding and performance.

• The generated data contributes to the continuous enhancement of SoTaNa’s capabilities.

References to Relevant Research Papers and Projects

---

• Various research papers and projects related to open-source software development and language models have influenced SoTaNa’s development.

• Studies on instruction data scaling, code generation, and evaluation have contributed to the model’s advancements.

• References include Alpaca, ChatGPT, LLaMA, and Wizardlm, among others.

Key Takeaways

---

• SoTaNa is an open-source software development assistant that utilizes ChatGPT and enhances the LLaMA model.

• It demonstrates effectiveness in assisting developers through human evaluation and has capabilities in code summarization and generation.

• OpenAI has curated instruct-based datasets to address the challenge of understanding human-written instructions.

• The approach focuses on parameter-efficient tuning of large language models (LLMs) using the Lora method.

• SoTaNa leverages LLMs to generate high-quality instruction-based data for software engineering tasks and fine-tunes the LLaMA model with software engineering-related data.

• SoTaNa is a valuable tool for developers seeking efficient and effective support in their software development tasks.

---

[Visuals: Include visuals such as screenshots of SoTaNa in action, graphs showcasing its performance, and images representing the collaboration within the open-source community.]

Getting from Generative AI to Trustworthy AI

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 10,836 words - view

Generative AI Limitations

---

• Generative AI, relying on large language models (LLMs), is the dominant approach in AI.

• LLMs have limitations in reasoning and trustworthiness.

• Outputs produced by LLMs are plausible but lack deeper understanding. [Visual: Comparison between generative AI output and trustworthy AI output]

Trustworthy AI Capabilities

---

• A trustworthy AI should possess 16 capabilities.

• It should provide explanations for its reasoning and sources of evidence.

• It should be able to perform deductions and make inferences based on known information.

Effective Communication

---

• Trustworthy AI should communicate effectively.

• It should adapt to the level of ambiguity or vagueness in a conversation.

• The AI should continuously update its model of communication. [Visual: Conversational dialogue with adaptable responses]

Knowledge Contextualization

---

• Contextualization and reasoning within and across contexts are crucial for trustworthy AI.

• Understanding the use context, including inferring the purpose of a question, is important.

• Consideration of available resources is necessary for accurate responses.

Broad and Deep Knowledge

---

• Trustworthy AI should possess a broad and deep knowledge of the world.

• It should include common sense, models of various subjects, and quick access to relevant information.

• The AI should be able to explain and reason about its knowledge. [Visual: Knowledge graph with interconnected nodes]

Logic-Based AI Systems

---

• Logic-based AI systems provide a different source of power compared to LLMs.

• However, even logic-based AI can lead to errors with long reasoning chains.

• Cyc, an AI system, uses a general rule-based approach to handle complex knowledge.

Cyc's Knowledge Base Efficiency

---

• Cyc applies general rules instead of relying on a large number of specific facts.

• Efficient knowledge base building is achieved through the use of Cyc’s general rule-based approach.

• Special-purpose reasoners have been developed to improve Cyc’s speed. [Visual: Cyc’s knowledge base structure]

Prioritizing Arguments

---

• Cyc gathers pro- and con-arguments for different answers to prioritize them.

• Meta-level rules are used to determine which arguments are given priority.

• Natural language understanding and generation capabilities of Cyc are not as advanced as other AI models.

Integrating Generative AI and Symbolic Systems

---

• Combining generative AI with symbolic systems like Cyc can lead to trustworthy AI.

• One idea is to use Cyc to translate sentences generated by LLMs into a more reasoned form. [Visual: Integration of generative AI and symbolic systems]

References

---

• The summary provides a list of references cited in the document.

• These references discuss various aspects of AI and its challenges.

Achieving Trustworthy AI

---

• Trustworthy AI requires addressing the limitations of generative AI.

• Providing explanations, performing deductions, and effective communication are key.

• Integrating generative AI with symbolic systems like Cyc can lead to trustworthy AI.

The Poison of Alignment in Language Models

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 3,273 words - view

Introduction

---

• Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on complex benchmarks and professional exams.

• Knowledge distillation models have claimed performances comparable to ChatGPT.

• However, fine-tuned models often lack reasoning capabilities and factual accuracy.

Dataset Cleaning

---

• Dataset cleaning methods have significantly enhanced the performance of LLMs trained on public datasets.

• Cleaning and deduplicating data are crucial for optimal model performance.

• Recent studies challenge the belief that curated datasets outperform web-crawled datasets.

Supervised Fine-tuning

---

• Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on open-source LLMs has gained popularity.

• However, SFT models do not always show performance improvement over base models.

• Aligned answers in SFT datasets may act as a poisonous contaminant, nudging model behavior in an undesirable direction.

Dataset Collection and Cleaning

---

• Dataset collected from GoatChat app with over 3 million users.

• Basic quality filtering and removal of defective data points.

• Alignment removal significantly improves fine-tuned model performance.

Experimental Setup

---

• Training conducted on one node with 8xA100 NVIDIA GPU.

• Bfloat16 and DeepSpeed ZeRO-3 used for memory optimization.

• Effective batch size set at 512 for training 7B models.

Evaluation

---

• Models evaluated on reasoning benchmarks: MMLU, BBH, HumanEval, and DROP.

• Fine-tuned model with alignment removal outperforms base model in MMLU and BBH.

• Performance improvements range from 4.1% to 33.3%.

Ablation Study

---

• Ablation study conducted with aligned dataset and dataset without alignment.

• Model trained on aligned dataset did not improve over the base model.

• Model trained on cleaned dataset showed remarkable performance increase.

Limitations

---

• Study inherits limitations of LLaMA 2, including data biases and lack of world understanding.

• Lack of computing resources limited fine-tuning models over 7B.

Conclusion

---

• Alignment acts as a source of instruction dataset poisoning in supervised fine-tuning.

• Dataset cleaning and alignment removal improve model performance.

• Quality of data has a greater impact on model performance than data quantity.

Key Points

---

• Alignment in supervised fine-tuning datasets limits harmful content generation in LLMs.

• Aligned answers significantly worsen model performance on reasoning benchmarks.

• Dataset cleaning and preparation are crucial for improving supervised instruction fine-tuning.

• The quality of data has a greater impact on model performance than data quantity.

Vector Search Revolution: OpenAI Embeddings + Lucene

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 4,792 words - view

Introduction

---

• Vector search using OpenAI embeddings and Lucene

• Challenging the necessity of a dedicated vector store

• Demonstrating the effectiveness of OpenAI embeddings

Leveraging Existing Components

---

• Easy implementation of state-of-the-art vector search

• Mapping logical scoring model to the OpenAI embedding API

• Combining existing components for efficient search

Lucene for Efficient Indexing

---

• Encoding the entire corpus with OpenAI embeddings

• Indexing the embedding vectors using Lucene

• Evaluation of performance on MS MARCO development set queries

Alternative Means for Vector Search

---

• Considering alternatives to dedicated vector stores

• Complexity of modern enterprise architectures

• Utilizing Lucene ecosystem for search capabilities

Lucene vs. Faiss

---

• Comparing Lucene and Faiss for vector search

• Differences in query throughput and scalability

• Benefits of Lucene’s slower query throughput

Academic Papers and Conference Proceedings

---

• Related research on information retrieval and dense passage retrieval

• Highlighting “A Proposed Conceptual Framework for a Representational Approach to Information Retrieval” by Jimmy Lin in 2021

• Exploring other valuable resources in the field

Results of Vector Search Experiments

---

• Discussion on the results of vector search experiments

• Comparisons with other models and indexing variations

• Insights into the performance of OpenAI embeddings with Lucene

Revolutionizing Vector Search with OpenAI Embeddings and Lucene

---

• Efficient implementation without a dedicated vector store

• Leveraging existing components for state-of-the-art search capabilities

• Reminder of the main message: Vector search is revolutionized through the combination of OpenAI embeddings and Lucene.