Reinforced Self-Training for Language Modeling: Aligning LLMs with Human Preferences

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 11,451 words - view

Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) Method

---

• ReST aligns large language models (LLMs) with human preferences.

• ReST involves generating a dataset using an initial LLM policy.

• Offline reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are used to improve the model.

Simple and Stable Approach

---

• ReST is a simple and stable method for language modeling.

• It has a small number of hyperparameters.

• The approach trains a model on a dataset using the negative log likelihood (NLL) loss.

Different Variants Outperform Supervised Learning

---

• Different variants of ReST significantly outperform supervised learning in language modeling.

• Even after just the first grow step, ReST shows superior performance.

• The best loss function for ReST is BC loss.

References to Relevant Papers and Resources

---

• The document includes references to papers and resources related to reinforcement learning and language modeling.

• Papers published by DeepMind and other researchers and organizations are cited.

• Topics covered include training language models using reinforcement learning.

Evaluation with Metric X

---

• ReST uses a reference-free reward model called Metric X to evaluate translations.

• Results are reported in terms of average rewards on the validation set.

• The variants of ReST are named based on their performance in the evaluation.

Vulnerability of Reference-Free Reward Models

---

• In experiments, reference-free reward models showed vulnerability to distribution shifts and reward hacking.

• Pre-computed rewards were stored for generated data to ensure high-quality rewards.

• However, the reward model still showed signs of vulnerability.

Previous Work and Launchpad Programming Model

---

• The document references previous work on unsupervised word sense disambiguation.

• It also introduces Launchpad, a programming model for distributed machine learning research.

• Launchpad is used in the context of language modeling.

Key Takeaways

---

• Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) aligns large language models (LLMs) with human preferences.

• Different variants of ReST outperform supervised learning in language modeling.

• The vulnerability of reference-free reward models highlights the need for robust evaluation methods.

• The document includes references to relevant papers and resources, including those from DeepMind.

• ReST offers a simple and stable approach for improving language models.

---

[Visuals: Graphs showing the performance comparison between ReST variants and supervised learning]

Efficient Fuzzing via Shapley-Guided Byte Selection

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 15,211 words - view

Introduction

---

• Mutation-based fuzzing is an effective method for discovering bugs in software programs.

• Shapley analysis is used to understand the effect of byte positions on fuzzing.

• ShapFuzz is a fuzzer that uses Shapley values to guide the byte selection process, resulting in improved edge coverage and bug discovery.

• The Shapley-Guided Byte Selection method efficiently fuzzes programs and discovers new code by calculating the Shapley values of bytes.

Shapley-Guided Byte Selection Method

---

• Shapley values are calculated for each byte to determine their importance in code discovery.

• Seeds that do not change length and maintain the same genetic relationship are used to identify control flow-related bytes.

• Sharing the Shapley value of byte j among these seeds improves efficiency.

• Visual: Graph showing the calculation of Shapley values for each byte.

S HAP F UZZ Technique

---

• S HAP F UZZ aims to efficiently generate new inputs for program testing by maintaining the same length after mutation.

• The technique focuses on building families of inputs that maintain the same length after mutation.

• The cosine similarity between a seed and center seeds is used to guide the byte selection process.

• Visual: Chart comparing the effectiveness of S HAP F UZZ with other fuzzing techniques.

Performance Comparison

---

• SHAPFUZZ consistently requires less time to analyze programs compared to other fuzzers.

• As the length of the seed decreases, the analysis time decreases for all fuzzers.

• SHAPFUZZ shows the most efficient bug discovery rate among all tested fuzzers.

• Visual: Bar graph comparing the analysis time, edge coverage, and bug discovery of different fuzzers.

Related Research Papers

---

• Several research papers on efficient fuzzing techniques are referenced in the text.

• These papers include STEELIX, UNIFUZZ, and PATA.

• The referenced papers provide additional insights into the topic of efficient fuzzing.

• Visual: Image showcasing the covers of the referenced research papers.

Conclusion

---

• SHAPFUZZ is an efficient fuzzing technique that utilizes Shapley analysis and byte selection to improve code coverage and bug discovery.

• It outperforms other fuzzers in terms of analysis time, edge coverage, and bug discovery.

• The Shapley-Guided Byte Selection method offers a novel approach to efficient fuzzing.

• Remember to consider SHAPFUZZ when looking for an effective fuzzing technique.

---

Note: The visuals mentioned in the slides are suggestions and can be modified based on the availability and relevance of appropriate visuals.

The Poison of Alignment in Language Models

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 3,273 words - view

Introduction

---

• Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on complex benchmarks and professional exams.

• Knowledge distillation models have claimed performances comparable to ChatGPT.

• However, fine-tuned models often lack reasoning capabilities and factual accuracy.

Dataset Cleaning

---

• Dataset cleaning methods have significantly enhanced the performance of LLMs trained on public datasets.

• Cleaning and deduplicating data are crucial for optimal model performance.

• Recent studies challenge the belief that curated datasets outperform web-crawled datasets.

Supervised Fine-tuning

---

• Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on open-source LLMs has gained popularity.

• However, SFT models do not always show performance improvement over base models.

• Aligned answers in SFT datasets may act as a poisonous contaminant, nudging model behavior in an undesirable direction.

Dataset Collection and Cleaning

---

• Dataset collected from GoatChat app with over 3 million users.

• Basic quality filtering and removal of defective data points.

• Alignment removal significantly improves fine-tuned model performance.

Experimental Setup

---

• Training conducted on one node with 8xA100 NVIDIA GPU.

• Bfloat16 and DeepSpeed ZeRO-3 used for memory optimization.

• Effective batch size set at 512 for training 7B models.

Evaluation

---

• Models evaluated on reasoning benchmarks: MMLU, BBH, HumanEval, and DROP.

• Fine-tuned model with alignment removal outperforms base model in MMLU and BBH.

• Performance improvements range from 4.1% to 33.3%.

Ablation Study

---

• Ablation study conducted with aligned dataset and dataset without alignment.

• Model trained on aligned dataset did not improve over the base model.

• Model trained on cleaned dataset showed remarkable performance increase.

Limitations

---

• Study inherits limitations of LLaMA 2, including data biases and lack of world understanding.

• Lack of computing resources limited fine-tuning models over 7B.

Conclusion

---

• Alignment acts as a source of instruction dataset poisoning in supervised fine-tuning.

• Dataset cleaning and alignment removal improve model performance.

• Quality of data has a greater impact on model performance than data quantity.

Key Points

---

• Alignment in supervised fine-tuning datasets limits harmful content generation in LLMs.

• Aligned answers significantly worsen model performance on reasoning benchmarks.

• Dataset cleaning and preparation are crucial for improving supervised instruction fine-tuning.

• The quality of data has a greater impact on model performance than data quantity.

Optimizing Traffic Flow with Reinforcement Learning

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 7,202 words - view

Introduction

---

• Real-time traffic light control method using deep Q learning

• Incorporates reward function considering queue lengths, delays, travel time, and throughput

• Self-organizing traffic lights that use real-time traffic data

Adapting to Changing Traffic Conditions

---

• Reinforcement learning (RL) for adapting to changing traffic conditions

• Fixed-time schedules limited in handling random traffic conditions

• Inefficient traffic flow without adaptation

Deep Q Network (DQN)

---

• Deep neural networks used to approximate the Q value function

• Suitable for high-dimensional or continuous state spaces

• Enhances the efficiency and accuracy of traffic light control

Maximizing Traffic Flow

---

• Objective is to maximize traffic flow while minimizing delays and congestion

• Consideration of queue lengths, delays, travel time, and throughput

• Improves overall traffic efficiency and reduces congestion

Comparison to Traditional Fixed Signal Plans

---

• Deep Q learning algorithm compared to traditional fixed signal plans

• Adaptive nature of RL algorithm leads to better traffic flow management

• Increased efficiency and reduced delays with reinforcement learning

Studies on Traffic Light Control with RL

---

• Various studies conducted on traffic light control using reinforcement learning

• Self-organizing traffic lights with realistic simulations

• Advancements in optimizing traffic flow through RL algorithms

Challenges and Future Directions

---

• Further research needed to address complex traffic scenarios

• Integration of real-time data for more accurate decision-making

• Potential for incorporating other factors like weather conditions

References

---

[Include relevant visuals such as graphs or charts depicting traffic flow improvement]

• Path recommendations during public transit disruptions

• Capacity-constrained network performance models for urban rail systems

• Calibrating path choices and train capacities using RL techniques

Improving Traffic Management with Reinforcement Learning

---

• Reinforcement learning offers a promising approach to optimize traffic flow

• Adaptive algorithms and real-time data integration enhance efficiency

• Effective traffic light control crucial for reducing delays and congestion

Evaluating Poker Skills of ChatGPT and GPT-4

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 6,491 words - view

Introduction

---

• ChatGPT and GPT-4 have not been extensively tested in playing poker

• Poker requires decision making under uncertainty and incomplete information

Pre-flop Positions and Actions

---

• Pre-flop positions and actions in poker are discussed in the study

• The big blind (BB) is the minimum bet and a position in poker

• The under-the-gun (UTG) player is the first to act after the big blind

Importance of Card Suit in Pre-flop Decisions

---

• Suited cards are represented by ‘s’ and unsuited cards are represented by ‘o’ in the poker charts

• The relevant information for making pre-flop decisions is whether the pair of cards are suited or unsuited

Evaluation of Poker Skills using Different Prompts

---

• The study evaluates the poker skills of ChatGPT and GPT-4 using different prompts

• Verbose-type prompt provides a detailed description, while short-type prompt is concise and commonly used in the poker community

ChatGPT's Strategy: Position Awareness

---

• ChatGPT plays fewer hands from earlier positions and more hands from later positions

• Position awareness is an important aspect of poker strategy

Guidelines for Asking ChatGPT to Make Pre-flop Decisions

---

• Provide the cards in a short format, such as AKo or AKs

• Write the higher ranked card first for more accurate responses

GPT-4's Advanced Knowledge of Concepts

---

• GPT-4 showed a deep understanding of the game and advanced knowledge of concepts like position

• GPT-4 had no limps in its pre-flop range, indicating expertise

Suboptimal Strategies of ChatGPT and GPT-4

---

• ChatGPT plays a tight and conservative game

• GPT-4 is overly aggressive

• Both models exhibit suboptimal strategies in poker

Conclusion

---

• ChatGPT and GPT-4 have potential for improvement in poker skills

• Poker remains a challenging domain for language models

Key Takeaways

---

• ChatGPT and GPT-4 need further testing in playing poker

• Poker requires decision making under uncertainty and incomplete information

• Position awareness is crucial in pre-flop decisions

• Short-format card descriptions improve accuracy of responses

• Both models exhibit suboptimal strategies in poker