Physics-informed neural networks, large language models, reasoning failures, schema-learning, latent perspectives
Welcome back to the pulse of trending research, where we unlock the most thought-provoking findings from the world of Arxiv. Today, we delve into the scaling of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for high-dimensional PDEs - a topic sparking debates about quantum computing capabilities on Hacker News. We also explore the application of Large Language Models in compiler optimization, a transformative technology raising questions about accuracy and limitations. We’ll also plunge into the challenge of multi-hop reasoning failures and the intriguing solution of memory injections. Plus, we’ll uncover how clone-structured causal graphs can illuminate in-context learning, and how GPT-2 models can decipher media perspectives on public figures. Buckle up for a thrilling journey through the latest cutting-edge research and join the conversation on Hacker News. Let’s get started!
1) Scaling Physics-Informed Neural Networks for High-Dimensional PDEs
This text discusses the scaling of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for high-dimensional PDEs, which involves randomly selecting indices and computing gradients.
A Hacker News discussion questions the feasibility of solving the Schrodinger equation with multiple dimensions on a non-quantum computer. View on HN
- Physics-informed neural networks are being used to tackle the curse of dimensionality.
- The Schrodinger equation, a quantum-mechanical equation, is difficult to solve with thousands of dimensions on a non-quantum computer.
- ML people consider each free parameter as an extra dimension, leading to high-dimensional systems.
- Physicists describe dimensionality in specific systems, but it doesn’t limit the dimensionality of other systems.
- Each pixel in a high-resolution 2D image is considered a dimension in machine learning.
- Neural networks can have different ordering of dimensions, affecting memory locality.
- Physics uses multi-dimensional vectors, while machine learning uses feature vectors.
- Applications are open for YC Winter 2024.
2) Large Language Models for Compiler Optimization
The document explores the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in compiler optimization, specifically in compiler pass ordering, and introduces a 7B-parameter transformer model trained to optimize LLVM assembly for code size.
Large Language Models are valuable for improving compiler efficiency, but ensuring their accuracy and compliance with limitations is difficult, as they do not generate immediate outcomes. View on HN
- Large Language Models (LLMs) can be used for compiler optimization by determining the order and application of passes.
- LLMs need more data to perform better, but provable correctness and adhering to constraints are challenges.
- LLMs are used to determine which compiler passes to use, not directly produce result code.
- Accuracy and measurement of a language model’s output in compiler optimization is a topic of discussion.
- ChatGPT has shown promise in source to source optimization, outperforming gcc on simple toy problems.
- Leakage of secret information is a concern in LLM systems, but interesting work is being done in Lean, a functional language.
- LLMs may potentially require fewer parameters since they don’t perform whole program synthesis.
- LLVM’s optimizations focus on maximizing performance rather than minimizing instructions. Code size reduction is critical.
3) Memory Injections Correcting Multi-Hop Reasoning Failures
The article discusses the problem of multi-hop reasoning failures in Large Language Models and suggests a solution called memory injections.
4) Schema-learning and rebinding in in-context learning
The paper suggests using clone-structured causal graphs as an effective tool for understanding in-context learning in large language models.
5) Characterizing Latent Perspectives of Media Houses
The paper suggests using pre-trained language models like GPT-2 to analyze media perspectives on public figures through a zero-shot approach for generative characterizations.