Spellburst: A Node-based Interface for Exploratory Creative Coding

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 17,729 words - view

Introduction

---

• Spellburst is a node-based interface for exploratory creative coding.

• It addresses the challenges faced by artists when translating semantic constructs into program syntax.

• The goal is to facilitate iteration and provide a visually-driven interface for creating generative art.

Comparison to Current Programming Tools

---

• Current programming tools lack the ability to compare results across multiple runs of a program.

• Generative AI tools based on large language models allow for quick exploration but can be tedious for fine editing.

• Spellburst aims to bridge this gap by providing an AI-based version control system for creative coding.

Node-based Programming and Natural Language Prompting

---

• Spellburst incorporates visual node-based programming and natural language prompting.

• This allows artists to easily map their expressive intents to low-level code.

• The system provides a user-friendly interface for creating and iterating upon generative art projects.

Informal Versioning Practices

---

• Participants in a study used informal versioning practices to keep track of visual outputs.

• Creative Software Tools (CSTs) should provide integrated versioning and tracking as part of the rapid exploration process.

• Spellburst aims to support this need by offering a seamless version control experience.

Code Viewing and Manual Updates

---

• In Spellburst, users can view and manually update the code.

• The interface provides sliders for adjusting global variables, allowing real-time changes to the output.

• This feature enables artists to fine-tune their generative art projects.

Few-shot Prompting for Better Code Generation

---

• Using GPT-3.5 to generate p5.js code, simple one-sentence questions did not produce satisfactory results.

• Spellburst employs few-shot prompting, which involves providing the model with multiple input and output examples.

• This technique improves the quality of the generated code and enhances the creative coding experience.

Auto-complete System for Creative Text Generation

---

• Spellburst’s auto-complete system suggests non-deterministic options to encourage exploration and deep thinking.

• It presents a range of possible suggestions for creative text generation tasks.

• The prompt auto-complete is implemented by querying ChatGPT and using few-shot prompting.

Regenerated Code and Causal Structure

---

• Regenerated code only affects immediately connected sketches/edges one layer deep.

• When a node is deleted from a graph, its descendants will be reattached to the deleted node’s parent node.

• This preserves the overall structure of the graph.

User Feedback and Interpretability of Outputs

---

• Participants in the evaluation of Spellburst expressed the need for more interpretability of the generative outputs.

• The system provided clear error messages and easy recovery options.

• Users found the interface pleasant to use and were satisfied with the system overall.

Conclusion

---

• Spellburst is a node-based interface designed to support creative coding.

• It facilitates the translation of semantic constructs into program syntax through node-based programming and natural language prompts.

• With its AI-based version control system and user-friendly features, Spellburst is a valuable tool for artists in their exploratory creative coding journey.

EarthPT: A Foundation Model for Earth Observation

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 3,680 words - view

Introduction

---

• EarthPT is an Earth Observation (EO) pretrained transformer model

• Trained in an autoregressive self-supervised manner

• Large number of parameters (700 million)

Accurate Forecasting

---

• EarthPT accurately predicts future pixel-level surface reflectances

• Outperforms simple phase-folded models based on historical averaging

• Typical error of approximately 0.05 for forecasting the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)

Semantically Meaningful Embeddings

---

• EarthPT embeddings hold valuable information

• Can be used for downstream tasks like land use classification

• Provides highly granular and dynamic classification

Scaling Potential

---

• Abundance of EO data allows for scaling EarthPT without data-imposed limits

• No theoretical data limit for EarthPT and similar models

• Potential to train significantly larger models

Mitigating Environmental Threats

---

• EarthPT provides a method to predict future events associated with environmental threats

• Enables mitigation strategies for threats like drought conditions

• Actionable predictions on key remote sensing indices

Applications in Various Sectors

---

• EarthPT has applications in agriculture, insurance, and beyond

• Land cover classification for crop type, growth stage, and events

• Diverse applications in a range of sectors

Future Work

---

• Deriving a specific scaling law for EO datasets

• Training larger models with more data for improved performance

• Exploring applications and extending EarthPT

Key Takeaways

---

• EarthPT accurately predicts future pixel-level surface reflectances

• Semantically meaningful embeddings for downstream tasks

• Abundance of EO data allows for scaling without limits

• Mitigation of future events associated with environmental threats

• Applications in agriculture, insurance, and other sectors

Uncovering Mesa-Optimization Transformers in Deep Learning

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 26,992 words - view

Transformers' Bias Towards Mesa-Optimization

---

• Transformers have a superior performance in deep learning due to their architectural bias towards mesa-optimization.

• Autoregressive Transformers use gradient-based mesa-optimization algorithms for prediction.

Include image/graph showing the performance advantage of Transformers

Avoiding Memory Overhead in Mesa-Optimization Transformers

---

• The Sherman-Morrison formula can be used to avoid memory overhead in mesa-optimization Transformers during the backward pass.

Include a diagram illustrating the implementation of the Sherman-Morrison formula

• Parallelization during training is not possible with this implementation.

Repurposing Autoregressively-Trained Transformers

---

• Autoregressively-trained Transformers can be repurposed for few-shot learning tasks and consecutive task learning.

• Prompt tuning and the use of prefix prompts further improve the performance of these models.

Include examples or case studies showcasing the effectiveness of repurposed Transformers

Greedy Local Learning Algorithms in Deep Learning

---

• Greedy local learning algorithms in deep learning models achieve strong performance in natural tasks without top-down information.

• This approach has connections to research on local learning rules in theoretical neuroscience.

Include an image or graph demonstrating the performance improvement with greedy local learning algorithms

Mesa-Layer with a Forget Factor

---

• The proposed mesa-layer with a forget factor improves the performance of deep learning models.

• It utilizes the recursive least squares problem with forgetting, widely used in online learning literature.

Include a diagram illustrating the structure and functioning of the mesa-layer

Computation of the Mesa Layer in Deep Learning

---

• The computation of the Mesa layer in deep learning involves backward pass methods via Sherman-Morrison and the implicit function theorem.

• A parallel backward pass through Neumann series approximation is also mentioned.

Include a visual representation of the computation process

Optimizing the Forward Pass with Truncated Neumann Series

---

• The forward pass in deep learning can be optimized using a K-step truncated Neumann series.

• This approach allows for efficient computation of terms for all time steps in parallel.

Include a graph or chart illustrating the efficiency gains with the truncated Neumann series

Key Takeaways

---

• Transformers’ architectural bias towards mesa-optimization contributes to their superior performance in deep learning.

• Mesa-optimization Transformers can be optimized and repurposed for various tasks, including few-shot learning and consecutive task learning.

• Greedy local learning algorithms and mesa-layers with forget factors offer effective approaches to enhance deep learning models.

---

[Include a captivating image or quote to leave a lasting impression]

ModuleFormer: Enhancing Language Models with Modularity

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 8,390 words - view

Introducing ModuleFormer

---

• ModuleFormer is a neural network architecture that improves large language models.

• It enables module insertion and expert pruning.

• ModuleFormer achieves comparable performance to dense language models with reduced latency.

Visual: Image of ModuleFormer architecture

Leveraging Modularity for Efficiency

---

• ModuleFormer is based on the Sparse Mixture of Experts (SMoE).

• It allows for the insertion of new modules and expert pruning.

• This improves the efficiency and flexibility of large language models.

Visual: Comparison graph showing efficiency gains of ModuleFormer

Achieving Performance with Lower Latency

---

• ModuleFormer achieves the same performance as dense language models.

• It does so with lower latency and a smaller memory footprint.

• This allows for processing more tokens per second.

Visual: Comparison graph showing latency reduction of ModuleFormer

Stick-Breaking Attention for Position Encoding

---

• ModuleFormer utilizes stick-breaking attention for encoding position information.

• It simplifies length-extrapolation of self-attention.

• This enhances the ability to handle various sequence lengths effectively.

Visual: Illustration of stick-breaking attention mechanism

Load Balancing for Optimal Pretraining

---

• Load balancing techniques are employed during pretraining in ModuleFormer.

• This avoids wasting module capacity and maximizes mutual information between tokens.

• It ensures efficient utilization of resources for optimal performance.

Visual: Flowchart depicting load balancing process

Comparative Analysis of Inference Speed and Memory Consumption

---

• Table 2 provides information on inference speed, memory consumption, and throughput of different models.

• Measurements were taken on an A100 80GB GPU with a batch size of 32 and a sequence length of 1024 tokens.

• ModuleFormer demonstrates competitive performance in terms of speed and memory efficiency.

Visual: Table comparing inference speed and memory consumption

Sparse Models and Efficient Tuning

---

• Sparse models experience less interference and perform better in terms of full finetuning.

• ModuleFormer architecture consistently achieves better results in efficient tuning compared to the baseline.

• It offers improved performance while maintaining efficiency.

Visual: Comparison graph showing tuning performance

ModuleFormer's Unique Features

---

• ModuleFormer includes stick-breaking attention heads and mutual information load balancing loss for pretraining.

• It also incorporates load concentration loss for finetuning.

• These features contribute to the overall effectiveness of ModuleFormer.

Visual: Visual representation of ModuleFormer's unique features

Impressive Results with Pretrained MoLM

---

• Pretraining a language model called MoLM using ModuleFormer yields impressive results.

• MoLM achieves the desired performance and efficiency goals.

• ModuleFormer proves its effectiveness in real-world language modeling tasks.

Visual: Screenshot of MoLM performance metrics

Relevant Citations and References

---

• The summary includes a list of citations for various papers related to language models, code evaluation, and modular multi-task learners.

• Topics covered include large language models, catastrophic forgetting, mixture of experts, and scaling.

• These references provide valuable insights into the research landscape of language models.

Visual: Collage of book covers representing the referenced papers

Unlocking Efficiency and Flexibility with ModuleFormer

---

• ModuleFormer leverages modularity to enhance large language models.

• It enables module insertion and expert pruning for improved efficiency and flexibility.

• By achieving comparable performance to dense language models with reduced latency, ModuleFormer proves its effectiveness in the field.

Visual: Image representing efficiency and flexibility

---

Remember: Embrace modularity with ModuleFormer for optimized language modeling performance.

A Survey on In-context Learning

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 12,912 words - view

Introduction to In-context Learning

---

• In-context learning (ICL) enables large language models (LLMs) to make predictions based on contexts.

• ICL is a new paradigm for natural language processing.

• ICL focuses on the training and inference stages of language models.

Strategies for Enhancing ICL Capability

---

• Supervised in-context finetuning, symbol tuning, and instruction tuning are proposed strategies.

• Model warmup adjusts LLMs before ICL.

• Mutual information is a valuable selection metric for demonstrations in ICL.

Visual: Graph comparing different strategies

Demonstration Formatting and Instruction Formatting

---

• Researchers focus on two main aspects of ICL: demonstration formatting and instruction formatting.

• Concatenating examples is one approach to aid learning.

• Different formatting approaches have been explored.

Visual: Example of demonstration formatting

Approaches to Improve Language Model Performance

---

• Self-Ask, iCAP, and Least-to-Most Prompting are three approaches to improve language model performance in ICL.

• Self-Ask enables models to generate follow-up questions.

• Different prompting methods have been developed.

Visual: Comparison of different prompting methods

Factors Influencing ICL Performance

---

• Domain source is more important than corpus size in the pre-training stage.

• Pretraining on related corpora enhances ICL ability.

• Other factors such as model architecture and fine-tuning techniques also influence performance.

Visual: Graph showing the impact of domain source on ICL performance

Bridging the Gap between Pretraining and ICL

---

• Intermediate tuning bridges the gap between pretraining objectives and ICL.

• Tailored pretraining objectives and metrics enhance LLMs for ICL.

• Promising performance improvements have been observed with these approaches.

Visual: Illustration of bridging the gap between pretraining and ICL

Key Takeaways

---

• In-context learning (ICL) allows LLMs to make predictions based on contexts.

• Strategies like supervised in-context finetuning and symbol tuning enhance ICL capability.

• Demonstration and instruction formatting play a crucial role in ICL.

• Different approaches like Self-Ask and iCAP improve language model performance in ICL.

• Factors such as domain source and tailored pretraining objectives influence ICL performance.

• Bridging the gap between pretraining and ICL shows promising results.

---

[Visual: An image that encapsulates the main message of the presentation]