Emotional Intelligence in Large Language Models

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 14,876 words - view

Introduction

• Large Language Models (LLMs) can understand and be enhanced by emotional stimuli

• Emotional intelligence plays a significant role in human behavior and interactions

• This study explores the grasp of psychological emotional stimuli by LLMs

Experimental Results

• LLMs’ performance can be improved with emotional prompts, with relative performance improvements of up to 115%

• A human study demonstrated that LLMs enhanced by emotional intelligence achieve better performance, truthfulness, and responsibility

• EmotionPrompt significantly boosts the performance of generative tasks, with an average improvement of 10.9%

Influence of Positive Emotional Stimuli

• Positive words contribute significantly to the performance of LLMs

• Positive emotional stimuli enhance the representation of LLMs

• Visual: Graph showing the impact of positive emotional stimuli on LLM performance

Effectiveness of Different Emotional Stimuli

• Different tasks require different emotional stimuli for optimal efficacy

• EP02 is the most effective stimulus in Instruction Induction tasks

• EP06 is the best stimulus in BIG-Bench tasks

Analysis of Input Attention Contributions

• Emotional stimuli enrich the representation of original prompts in LLMs

• Positive words have a greater contribution to the final outputs

• Visual: Diagram illustrating the input attention contributions

Factors Influencing EmotionPrompt's Performance

• Model dimensions influence the effectiveness of EmotionPrompt, with larger models potentially deriving greater advantages

• Pre-training strategies, such as supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, have discernible effects on EmotionPrompt

• Visual: Comparison chart showing the impact of model dimensions and pre-training strategies on EmotionPrompt

Effect of Temperature Setting on EmotionPrompt

• The relative gain of EmotionPrompt increases as the temperature setting grows

• EmotionPrompt exhibits lower sensitivity to temperature compared to vanilla prompts

• Visual: Line graph depicting the effect of temperature setting on EmotionPrompt

Conclusion

• LLMs can understand and be enhanced by emotional stimuli, opening up new possibilities for interdisciplinary research

• Emotional prompts improve LLM performance, truthfulness, and responsibility

• Emotional intelligence is crucial in understanding human behavior

Key Takeaways

• LLMs can understand and be enhanced by emotional stimuli, resulting in improved performance

• Positive emotional stimuli significantly contribute to LLM performance

• Different tasks require different emotional stimuli for optimal efficacy

• EmotionPrompt enriches the representation of original prompts and enhances LLM performance

Reminder: Emotional intelligence plays a vital role in advancing artificial intelligence models and understanding human behavior.

Evaluating Security of LLM Generated Code with SALLM

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 10,818 words - view

Introduction

• Large Language Models (LLMs) generate code but may have vulnerabilities

• Existing datasets and evaluation metrics do not address security considerations

• SALLM framework proposes a systematic approach to evaluate secure code generation

• LLMs like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT can generate insecure code

SALLM Framework Components

• SALLM consists of a curated dataset of security-centric Python prompts

• An evaluation environment to test the generated code’s security

• Novel metrics to evaluate LLMs’ performance in generating secure code

LLMs and Code Generation

• LLMs are trained on large datasets of text and code

• They excel in natural language processing tasks and can understand programming languages

• Examples of LLMs include BERT, T5, and GPT-3

Dataset Creation for SALLM

• SALLM dataset created by mining code snippets from StackOverflow, CWE, Sonar Rules, and CodeQL

• Prompts are manually crafted to reflect real-life security-centric needs

• Dataset covers a wide range of Common Weakness Enumerations (CWEs)

Evaluation Environment of SALLM

• SALLM framework includes runtime configurations to execute and verify generated code’s security

• Dynamic-based assessment techniques, such as unit tests, check functional and security behavior

• Static-based assessment techniques, like CodeQL, detect unsafe APIs and identify vulnerabilities caused by untrusted data flows

Performance Evaluation of LLMs

• Four models from three LLM families (CODEGEN, STARCODER, and GPT) tested on SALLM dataset

• Performance measured using pass@k, secure@k, and vulnerable@k metrics

• Results highlight areas for improvement in generating secure code

Practical Application of SALLM

• Code snippets generated by ChatGPT collected from public GitHub commits and source code comments

• SALLM framework used to detect vulnerabilities in these code snippets

• Demonstrates how SALLM can identify and prevent integration of vulnerable code

Conclusion

• SALLM framework provides a systematic approach to evaluate security of LLM-generated code

• Existing datasets and metrics are limited in addressing security considerations

• Evaluation of LLMs using SALLM framework highlights areas for improvement

• SALLM can help identify and prevent integration of vulnerable code

SALLM Dataset Overview

• Created to evaluate security of code generated by LLMs like ChatGPT

• Includes 423 compilable Python code samples generated by ChatGPT

• Covers a wide range of Common Weakness Enumerations (CWEs)

Performance of Different LLMs

• StarCoder performs the best in terms of generating secure code

• CodeGen-2B and CodeGen-2.5-7B have worse performance on average

• GPT-4 performs better than GPT-3.5-Turbo

Limitations and Threats to Validity

• Prompts were manually created, introducing potential bias

• Static analysis tool like CodeQL may suffer from imprecision

• Mitigated by using both static-based and dynamic-based approaches

Related Work in Code Generation Models

• Use of large language models like Codex and CodeBERT for code generation tasks

• Need for evaluating these models from a security perspective

Key Takeaways

• SALLM framework addresses the need for secure code generation by LLMs

• Existing datasets and metrics do not adequately represent security considerations

• Evaluation of LLMs using SALLM highlights areas for improvement

• SALLM helps identify and prevent integration of vulnerable code

GRACE Discriminator-Guided Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 20,805 words - view

Introduction

• GRACE improves pre-trained language models in complex reasoning tasks

• Correctness Discriminator enhances accuracy and sample efficiency

• GRACE does not require LM training or fine-tuning

Limitations of Language Models

• LMs struggle with multi-step reasoning tasks

• High likelihoods assigned to incorrect steps lead to incorrect solutions

• Decoding strategies optimize for solution likelihood

Introducing GRACE

• GRACE proposes Correctness Discriminator to guide decoding process

• Trained with contrastive loss over correct and incorrect steps

• Produces correct reasoning steps

Three Steps of GRACE

• Negative sampling to collect solutions with incorrect steps

• Alignment using Needleman-Wunsch algorithm to create examples

• Learning involves training the discriminator with max-margin loss

Guided Stepwise Decoding

• Candidate next steps sampled using nucleus sampling

• Scoring based on LM probability and discriminator score

• Top-scored step selected and added to prefix iteratively

Evaluation Results

• GRACE outperforms greedy decoding, verifiers, and self-consistency

• Improves final answer accuracy and intermediate reasoning correctness

• Evaluated on math word problems and symbolic reasoning tasks

Efficiency and Performance Analysis

• GRACE requires fewer samples than vanilla self-consistency

• Increasing discriminator score coefficient improves final answer accuracy

• Smaller discriminators can still achieve high accuracy

Related Work

• Controlled generation and multi-step reasoning in language models

• GRACE’s fine-grained control and novel training process for discriminator

Limitations and Future Directions

• Overhead incurred by sampling and computing discriminator scores

• Reliance on reference solutions for alignment

• Potential for extending GRACE to commercial APIs

Conclusion

• GRACE improves multi-step reasoning in language models

• Achieves higher accuracy in final answers and intermediate reasoning steps

• More sample-efficient than baselines

• Enhances correctness and quality of reasoning

Key Takeaways

• GRACE improves pre-trained language models in complex reasoning tasks

• Correctness Discriminator enhances accuracy and efficiency

• GRACE outperforms baselines in final answer accuracy and reasoning correctness

Ribbit: A Compact and Portable Scheme Implementation

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 9,509 words - view

Introduction

• Ribbit is a small and portable Scheme implementation that includes a virtual machine, compiler, and standard library.

Compactness and Conformance

• Ribbit is a compact and portable Scheme implementation that conforms to the R4RS standard.

• The system consists of the Ribbit VM (RVM), the Ribbit Scheme Compiler (RSC), and the standard library.

• Ribbit’s compactness allows for a R4RS compliant REPL that fits in a 7 KB Linux executable.

Optimized RIBN Encoding

• The encoding of the RIBN (Ribbit Intermediate Byte Notation) has been optimized for compactness and efficiency.

• The RIBN now uses an array of bytes with a base of 256, which is more space efficient.

• The new encoding supports the representation of loops and join points, reducing the exponential growth of code.

Decoding Instructions

• The decoding of the RIBN is done using a stack and decoding instructions.

• Decoding instructions have a type and an argument, encoded either in short or long form.

• The RSC compiler assigns ranges of codes to each type of decoding instruction and argument, allowing for efficient encoding and decoding.

Improvements and Enhancements

• Ribbit has made improvements in encoding strategy, LZSS compression, R4RS compliance, portable I/O system, and compactness.

• These improvements have resulted in a more efficient and flexible REPL implementation.

• Ribbit adheres to the R4RS standard in a compact footprint of 6.5 KB.

Ribbit: Compact, Efficient, and Compliant

• Ribbit is a compact and portable Scheme implementation that conforms to the R4RS standard.

• It provides efficient encoding, optimized decoding, and improved LZSS compression.

• Ribbit’s compact footprint of 6.5 KB makes it an ideal choice for resource-constrained environments.

Demystifying Rust Compiler Unstable Features and Impacts

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 12,361 words - view

Introduction - The Growing Popularity of Rust

• Rust programming language gaining popularity for security guarantees and performance

• Unstable features (RUF) introduced to extend Rust compiler functionality

• RUF can cause compilation failures and large-scale failures in the ecosystem

Analyzing Usage and Impacts of RUF

• Study aims to analyze RUF usage and impacts in the Rust ecosystem

• Techniques proposed to extract RUF accurately and assess impact

• Rust ecosystem uses 1000 different RUF, affecting up to 44% of package versions

RUF-Compilation-Failure Recovery Tool

• Designed and implemented tool to recover from RUF-compilation failures

• Tool can recover up to 90% of the failures, enhancing ecosystem stability

• Mitigates impacts of RUF on dependent packages

Addressing Challenges in Analyzing RUF

• Lack of official documentation and changing syntax addressed with new techniques

• Stability problems of the Rust compiler analyzed through abnormal RUF status transitions

• Techniques ensure accurate extraction and analysis of RUF usage

Ecosystem Dependency Graph (EDG)

• EDG generated to determine direct and transitive RUF impacts in the ecosystem

• Resolving package dependencies to accurately quantify RUF impacts

• Challenges like sampling, package-manager-specific rules, and conditional impacts addressed

High Accuracy in Dependency Resolution

• Evaluation of dependency resolution process shows high accuracy

• Average tree accuracy over 99%, precision, recall, and F1 scores above 98%

• Proposed resolution technique outperforms existing tools like Cargo Tree

Insights into RUF Usage and Impacts

• Study provides valuable insights into RUF usage and impacts in Rust ecosystem

• Reveals significant impacts and stability problems of RUF

• Mitigation techniques successfully recover up to 90% of package versions

Recommendations for Stabilizing RUF

• Stabilize RUF implementation and use them safely

• Backport fixes to old versions, limit RUF usage, and enable RUF only when necessary

• Audit RUF usage and dependencies to enhance reliability and security

Limitations and Related Work

• Study acknowledges limitations such as removal of local configurations and underestimation of RUF impacts

• Discusses related work on dependency analysis, ecosystem analysis, and compiler reliability research

Conclusion - Enhancing Rust Ecosystem

• Study provides insights into usage and impacts of RUF in Rust ecosystem

• Highlights need for stabilizing RUF and using them safely for reliability and security

• Proposed mitigation techniques show promising results in recovering from compilation failures caused by RUF

Key Takeaways

• Rust’s popularity is growing due to security guarantees and performance

• RUF can cause compilation failures and large-scale ecosystem failures

• Study analyzes RUF usage and impacts, proposes recovery tool, and recommends stabilization measures

[Include visuals like graphs/charts to illustrate data or examples where relevant]