Unraveling the Evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs)

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 2,384 words - view

On the Origin of LLMs

• LLMs like ChatGPT and Bard have gained millions of users

• Hugging Face repository has nearly 16,000 Text Generation models

• Lack of comprehensive index for LLMs

• Hierarchical clustering and graph visualization can reveal insights

Understanding LLMs through Hierarchical Clustering

• Apply hierarchical clustering to Hugging Face model names

• Similar names indicate similarity between LLMs

• Identify families and subgroups of LLMs

• Dendrograms, graphs, word clouds, and scatter plots as visualizations

Methodology and Data Collection

• Libraries used: BeautifulSoup, Pandas, Streamlit, Scipy, Plotly, Numpy, Scikit-learn, Radial Tree, NLTK, Matplotlib, Python-Louvain, NetworkX, Wordcloud, RegEx

• Data collection using BeautifulSoup to retrieve model names, likes, downloads

• Parameter extraction using RegEx pattern for model sizes

Analyzing and Visualizing the Data

• Text feature extraction using TF-IDF

• Hierarchical clustering with single linkage and cosine distance

• Agglomerative clustering with bar chart visualization

• Word clouds for understanding model families

Graph Visualization and Community Detection

• Graph representation of LLMs with edges indicating similarity

• Louvain method for community detection

• Fruchterman-Reingold algorithm for layout calculation

• Interactive visualization using Plotly library

Introducing Constellation - A Web Application

• Web app for exploring the dataset of LLMs

• Dendrograms, word clouds, and graphs generated dynamically

• Hover over nodes for metadata about models

• Scatter plot for likes versus downloads

Results and Findings

• 15,821 public models labeled as Text Generation

• Pearson correlation coefficient between likes and downloads

• Radial dendrogram showcasing LLM families

• Word clouds for clusters of models with over 1,000 downloads

• Graph visualization with communities detected

Explore Constellation Web App

• Access the web app at https://constellation.sites.stanford.edu/

• Specify minimum number of downloads for analysis

• Dendrograms, word clouds, and graphs at your fingertips

• Interactive scatter plot for model likes versus downloads

Unveiling the Hidden Universe of LLMs

• LLMs are evolving rapidly, necessitating systematic organization and understanding

• Constellation provides an intuitive visual representation of LLM relationships

• Hierarchical clustering and graph visualization offer insights into LLM families and structures

• Stay informed and engaged with the evolving landscape of LLMs

Behavior Changes in GPT-3.5 and GPT-4

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 5,229 words - view

Introduction

• GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 are large language models (LLMs) with varying behavior and performance.

• Monitoring behavior changes in GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 is important for understanding and leveraging these models.

Image of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4

Checking Divisibility for Prime Numbers

• Checking divisibility is a method to determine if a number is prime.

• Start by checking if the number is divisible by 2.

Diagram illustrating the process of checking divisibility

Metrics for Evaluating Language Models

• Verbosity measures the length of the generated text.

• Overlap compares the extracted answers from different versions of the same LLM for the same prompt.

Graph comparing verbosity and overlap metrics

June Update of GPT-3.5

• The June update of GPT-3.5 fixed a previous issue with reasoning steps generation.

• Different prompting approaches can lead to varying performance due to LLM drifts.

Before and after comparison of reasoning steps generation

Behavior Changes Over Time

• Behavior of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 has changed over time.

• Decrease in directly executable generations.

• Increase in verbosity.

Comparison chart showing behavior changes over time

References to Research Papers

• The document provides references to research papers on behavior changes in GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.

• Papers on program synthesis, evaluation of ChatGPT, assessing machine learning API shifts, measuring intelligence, and a large-scale longitudinal study.

Images of research paper covers or icons representing each topic

Key Takeaways

• GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 are powerful language models with varying behavior and performance.

• Monitoring behavior changes is crucial for understanding and leveraging these models effectively.

• Remember to consider metrics like verbosity and overlap when evaluating language models.

Image illustrating the potential of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4

Note: The visuals mentioned in brackets can be customized based on the specific content and availability of suitable images or charts.

Adam Instability in Large-Scale Machine Learning

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 10,736 words - view

Introduction

• The instability observed in the training of large language models is caused by the Adam optimization algorithm used for training.

• This presentation explores the main points of the paper “Adam Instability in Large-Scale Machine Learning”.

Image: Illustration of a language model

Notation and Terminology

• The paper discusses the notation and terminology used in large-scale machine learning, specifically in the context of the Adam optimization algorithm.

• Various symbols and operations used in the analysis are defined, such as vector notation, outer and inner products, and random variables.

Outer Product and Hessian

• The outer product of the gradient with itself can be written as a sum of terms, including a term that depends on the Hessian of the loss function.

• This relationship between the outer product and Hessian is crucial in understanding the Adam instability in large-scale machine learning.

Assumption of Small Magnitude

• The assumption that the non-diagonal components of the covariance matrix in large-scale machine learning are of a small magnitude is important.

• It affects the behavior and stability of the Adam optimization algorithm during training.

Distribution of Update Vector Components

• The components of the update vector can be considered to come from a distribution.

• Understanding the distribution of update vector components is essential in analyzing the Adam instability in large-scale machine learning.

Condition for Decreased Loss Value

• The paper presents a condition for the Adam step to lead to a decreased loss value.

• It explores an ideal case with exact gradient estimations and a time-domain correlation between the estimations.

Time-Domain Incoherence

• Time-domain incoherence between gradient estimations is crucial for efficient estimation of the diagonal of the Hessian inverse and the convergence of the Adam algorithm.

• The independence of gradient estimation components over time is a key factor in addressing the Adam instability.

Empirical and Theoretical Results

• The authors present empirical and theoretical results to explain the origins and behavior of training instabilities.

• These results provide insights into the Adam instability in large-scale machine learning.

Mitigating Instabilities

• Mitigating the instabilities in training loss can be achieved by adjusting parameters such as learning rate, division by zero treatment, and batch size.

• These adjustments can help improve the stability and convergence of the Adam optimization algorithm.

No One Solution

• There is no one solution to the problem of Adam instability in large-scale machine learning.

• The appropriate remedy depends on the specific training setup and may require experimentation and adaptation.

Summary and Main Message

• The Adam optimization algorithm is a main contributor to the instability observed in training large language models.

• Understanding the relationship between the outer product, Hessian, and update vector components is crucial in addressing the Adam instability.

• Mitigating instabilities through parameter adjustments can improve training stability and convergence.

Image: Visualization of training loss stability improvement

Note: The visuals mentioned in brackets [ ] are suggestions for incorporating relevant images or graphs to enhance the presentation.

Universal Neural-Cracking-Machines: The Future of Password Models

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 21,020 words - view

Introduction to Universal Password Models

• Universal password models automatically adjust their guessing strategy based on the target system

• Deep learning captures correlation between users’ auxiliary data and passwords

• Provides better password security and has various applications

Importance of Password Models

• Password models are crucial for password security and penetration testing

• Password strength meters rank passwords based on their security

• Autoregressive password models segment passwords into atomic components

Attention Mechanisms in Password Models

• Attention mechanisms compute a function of each query vector and other vectors in a set

• Used to enhance the performance of password models

• Visual: Graph showing the impact of attention mechanisms on password model performance

Universal Neural-Cracking-Machines (UNCM)

• Combination of Conditional Password model and Configuration Encoder

• UNCM adjusts its guessing strategy based on the target system

• Visual: Diagram illustrating the architecture of UNCM

Configuration Encoder in UNCM

• Configuration encoder consists of sub-encoder and mixing encoder

• Discretizes and embeds provider and domain strings

• Low-frequency strings are excluded and mapped to a different representation

Generating Configuration Seed with UNCM

• Encoder produces a configuration seed with sub-second latency

• Configuration seed guides the conditional password model

• Visual: Flowchart demonstrating the generation of a configuration seed

Performance of UNCM in Password Guessing

• UNCM outperforms manually configured password models

• Detects weak passwords missed by universal approximation

• Visual: Comparison chart showing the performance gains of UNCM over baseline models

Achieving Privacy with Differential Privacy

• Seed can be made differentially private for privacy protection

• Noise multiplier quantifies the privacy level for different credential databases

• Visual: Graph illustrating the trade-off between privacy level and utility loss

Self-Configurable Password Model

• First self-configurable password model that adapts to the target password distribution

• Addresses major problem in real-world application of password security techniques

• Visual: Image representing the adaptability of the self-configurable password model

Embracing Universal Neural-Cracking-Machines

• Universal Neural-Cracking-Machines revolutionize password security

• Adaptability and performance improvements make them the future of password models

• Remember: Universal password models enhance security and adaptability for all systems

Risk Assessment for AGI Companies Techniques and Recommendations

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 24,728 words - view

AGI Companies Must Improve Risk Management Practices

• AGI companies, such as OpenAI and Google DeepMind, need to improve their risk management practices.

• Concerns about catastrophic risks associated with artificial general intelligence necessitate better risk assessment.

• Risk assessments are essential for identifying, analyzing, and evaluating risks.

Importance of Risk Assessment for AGI Companies

• Risk assessments are crucial for AI systems, including future catastrophic risks and human extinction.

• Qualitative techniques are prioritized for quantifying the likelihood of catastrophic risks from AI.

• Some quantitative techniques should be attempted for better comparisons and communication.

Recommended Risk Assessment Techniques - Scenario Analysis

• Scenario analysis is recommended for investigating different futures and planning for various possibilities.

• Monitoring events that align with a scenario can serve as a warning sign.

• Scenarios developed through this technique should not be relied upon as accurate predictions.

Recommended Risk Assessment Techniques - Fishbone Method

• The fishbone method is useful for identifying risk sources quickly and efficiently.

• It is less likely to miss risk sources compared to brainstorming.

• However, it does not account for interactions between risk sources.

Recommended Risk Assessment Techniques - Risk Typologies

• Risk typologies and taxonomies are beneficial for identifying and understanding risks.

• They promote a common understanding among stakeholders.

• They support other risk assessment techniques.

Additional Risk Assessment Technique - Delphi Technique

• The Delphi technique can provide estimates on the likelihood of specific risks.

• This includes the likelihood of competitors releasing similar models or new AGI companies being founded.

• It helps inform important decisions in AGI companies.

Additional Risk Assessment Technique - Cross-Impact Analysis

• Cross-impact analysis helps organizations understand the interactions and correlations between different events.

• It involves gathering expert forecasts on event likelihood and considering the effects of other events.

• AGI companies can use this analysis to assess risks and generate future scenarios.

Additional Risk Assessment Technique - Bow Tie Analysis

• Bow tie analysis helps assess the effectiveness of controls in managing risks.

• It maps causes, consequences, and controls of an undesired event.

• Preventive controls aim to reduce the likelihood of the event, while mitigative controls aim to reduce its impact.

Using Risk Matrices to Visualize and Prioritize Risks

• Risk matrices can be used to visualize and prioritize risks.

• They help AGI companies rank the priority of catastrophic risks from AI.

• Evaluating these risks is challenging due to ethical considerations and the level of detail required.

Involving Multiple Stakeholders for Effective Risk Assessment

• Multiple stakeholders should be involved in risk assessment for AGI companies.

• Technical, human, and organizational factors must be considered.

• Risk assessment techniques are valuable only if their results inform decision-making.

Recommendations for AGI Companies

• AGI companies must improve risk management practices to address catastrophic risks.

• Recommended risk assessment techniques include scenario analysis, fishbone method, and risk typologies.

• Additional techniques such as Delphi technique, cross-impact analysis, bow tie analysis, and risk matrices can also be used.

• Involving multiple stakeholders and considering various factors is crucial for effective risk assessment in AGI companies.