Why AI is Harder Than We Think

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 7,143 words - view

The Cycle of Optimism and Disappointment

---

• The field of AI has experienced cycles of optimism and disappointment since the 1950s.

• Recent breakthroughs have not eliminated the challenges in developing AI technologies.

• Self-driving cars and housekeeping robots are more challenging to develop than anticipated.

Lack of True Understanding in AI Systems

---

• AI systems lack true understanding of the data they process.

• Debate exists on whether increasing network layers and training data can achieve understanding.

• Something fundamental may be missing in achieving true understanding.

Unawareness of Complexity in Human Thought Processes

---

• AI is challenging because we are unaware of the complexity of our own thought processes.

• Reasoning abilities are supported by unconscious sensorimotor knowledge evolved over billions of years.

• AI researchers often use wishful mnemonics without considering the complexity of human thought.

Overlooking Non-Symbolic Brain and Bodily Processes

---

• Early symbolic AI assumed intelligence could be achieved without incorporating non-symbolic brain or bodily processes.

• Intelligence and goals are separate in AI systems, lacking a holistic approach.

• Incorporating non-symbolic processes is crucial for achieving human-like intelligence.

Moving Away from Alchemy Approach

---

• AI has often been compared to alchemy, lacking a scientific understanding.

• To make real progress in AI, we need to move away from the alchemy approach.

• Scientific understanding and rigorous methods are essential for advancements in AI.

References to Explore

---

• Deep neural networks, machine learning, language understanding, reinforcement learning, and AI capabilities are covered in various articles and papers.

• Notable references include studies by Newell and Simon on computational power limitations in matching the complexity of the human brain.

Understanding the Challenges of AI

---

• The development of AI technologies is more challenging than anticipated.

• AI systems lack true understanding and complexity of human thought processes.

• Incorporating non-symbolic brain and bodily processes is crucial.

• Moving away from the alchemy approach and embracing scientific understanding are necessary for progress in AI.

Large Language Models as General Pattern Machines

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 11,230 words - view

The Power of Large Language Models (LLMs)

---

• LLMs can complete complex token sequences and exhibit pattern completion proficiency.

• LLMs can serve as general sequence modelers without additional training.

• LLMs can learn and complete patterns, improving sequences through in-context sequence transformation and extrapolation.

Utilizing LLMs for Pattern Completion

---

• Token indices or embeddings can be passed directly to LLMs or token alphabets that are unlikely to be grouped by the tokenizer to use LLMs as general pattern machines.

• LLMs can be applied to various tasks such as extending a wiping motion or drawing patterns.

• LLMs can improve sequences by combining in-context sequence transformation and extrapolation.

LLMs in Robotics: Pattern Reasoning

---

• LLMs can be used in robotics for pattern reasoning capabilities and completing patterns.

• The authors introduce a benchmark for evaluating the pattern reasoning capabilities of LLMs using procedurally generated transformations.

• LLMs demonstrate the ability to complete patterns in robotic applications.

Calibrating Language Models for Improved Performance

---

• Calibrating language models for improved few-shot performance is discussed in a paper presented at the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) in 2021.

• This approach aims to enhance the performance of LLMs in handling new tasks with limited training data.

• Improved calibration can lead to better generalization and adaptability of LLMs.

References to Further Research

---

• The document provides a list of references to various research papers and conference proceedings related to the use of large language models in different applications.

• Topics covered include logical reasoning, quantitative reasoning, robotic affordances, planning goals, object rearrangement, optimal control, and more.

• These references serve as valuable resources for exploring the capabilities and applications of LLMs.

Token Invariance and New Embedding Vectors

---

• The text excerpt discusses experiments and additional details related to large language models (LLMs), including token invariance.

• New token embedding vectors that the model has not seen during training are introduced to investigate the token invariance of LLMs.

• This experiment provides insights into the robustness and adaptability of LLMs in handling unseen tokens.

Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models

---

• Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized pattern completion and sequence modeling.

• LLMs can be utilized in various domains, including robotics, few-shot learning, and improved calibration.

• The ability of LLMs to learn and complete patterns without additional training makes them powerful tools for complex sequence generation.

---

[Note: Visuals such as graphs, images, and charts can be added to relevant slides to enhance understanding and engagement.]

The Maximum Tension Principle in General Relativity

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 3,452 words - view

Introduction

---

• The principle of maximum tension establishes the maximum force between two bodies with positive masses as Fg = c^4/4G.

• It is an “impossibility statement” that imposes an upper bound on the tension or force in General Relativity.

• This principle has a simple and natural form in four spacetime dimensions.

Unbounded Tension in Newtonian Gravity

---

• At the Newtonian level, the tension in the gravitational field is unbounded.

• The Newtonian stress tensor has opposite properties from those in electrostatics.

• The gravitational force per unit volume is repulsive along the field lines and tensile in the transverse direction.

Natural Limit in General Relativity

---

• In General Relativity, the tension in the gravitational field has a natural limit due to gravitational collapse and black hole formation.

• The phenomenon of gravitational collapse imposes a maximum tension between two bodies.

• This limit prevents the tension from becoming unbounded.

Relation to String Theory

---

• The Principle of Maximum Tension is related to the tension in string theory.

• Classically, there is a purely classical relation between G, the classical string coupling constant ?, and the velocity of light c.

• The tension in string theory provides a natural unit of force or tension.

Higher Dimensions

---

• The heuristic argument of the principle can be applied in higher dimensions, but it yields a bound on F/D^(n-4).

• The method of rods breaks down in higher dimensions, and deficit angles do not go over smoothly.

• Natural sources for distributional Ricci curvature are (n-2)-branes with co-dimension two world volumes.

Born-Infeld Theory

---

• The Born-Infeld Lagrangian, arising from open strings, gives rise to an upper bound on the force or tension on the ends of the string.

• The effective action involves the product eF?? and provides an upper bound to the force or tension.

• The critical electric field E_s sets the upper limit.

Regge Trajectories

---

• Classical relativistic strings have bounds on angular momentum J and mass M, resulting in Regge trajectories.

• The bounds differ for open and closed strings, but they provide insights into the relation between gravity and string theory.

• The bounds are related to the tension in classical general relativity.

Quantum Mechanics

---

• Planck’s introduction of a unit of action breaks the scaling invariance in classical general relativity and makes possible a complete system of fundamental units.

• The Planck length provides a least length, while the string length is probably shorter.

• The existence of a fundamental electric charge also breaks the scaling invariance and provides a unit of charge.

Maximal Acceleration and Temperature

---

• A theory with a minimal length should have a maximal acceleration and a maximal temperature.

• Classical general relativity and classical string theory do not provide maximal acceleration or temperature.

• Quantum gravity and string theory hint at the existence of maximal acceleration and temperature.

Key Points

---

• The Maximum Tension Principle establishes an upper bound on the tension or force in General Relativity.

• The principle has a simple and natural form in four spacetime dimensions.

• It is related to the tension in string theory and provides insights into the fundamental constants of nature.

The Emergence of Anaphoric Structure in Neural Networks

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 5,384 words - view

Introduction

---

• Anaphoric structure can develop in artificial neural networks during communication training.

• Languages with anaphoric structures are learnable by neural models.

• The study explores the emergence of anaphoric structure between models without additional constraints.

Previous Research

---

• Languages between neural agents are shaped by network biases and training objectives.

• Previous work focused on the conditions for the emergence of syntactic structure.

• Efficiency pressures on a speaker influence the emergence of anaphoric structure.

Experiment Setup

---

• Neural networks trained using three languages: No Elision, Pronoun, and Pro-drop.

• Receiver trained to map signals to meanings.

• Redundant roles in certain languages lead to increased ambiguity.

Impact of Anaphoric Structures

---

• Anaphoric structures increase ambiguity and training time.

• Overt anaphoric forms reduce ambiguity and aid understanding.

• Ambiguity is not a concern for the model’s communicative accuracy.

Measures of Evidence

---

• Review of three measures for evidence of anaphoric structure emergence.

• Processing complexity, communicative efficiency, and semantic typology.

• Linguistic communication in referential games and the theory of conversation.

Conclusion

---

• The emergence of anaphoric structure in neural networks has been explored in recent research.

• Efficiency pressures on a speaker play a crucial role in the emergence of anaphoric structure.

• Overt anaphoric forms reduce ambiguity and aid understanding.

Key Takeaways

---

• Anaphoric structure can emerge in artificial neural networks trained for communication tasks.

• Efficiency pressures on a speaker influence the emergence of anaphoric structure.

• Overt anaphoric forms in a language reduce ambiguity and aid understanding.

• The study shows that ambiguity is not a concern for the model’s communicative accuracy.

• The emergence of anaphoric structure in neural networks has been explored in recent research.

• The study uses three different languages: No Elision, Pronoun, and Pro-drop.

• Anaphoric structures play a crucial role in language development and understanding.

The Evolution of CAPTCHAs: An Empirical Study Evaluation

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 12,618 words - view

Introduction

---

• CAPTCHAs have evolved due to advances in computer vision and machine learning

• Understanding the time it takes for users to solve CAPTCHAs is important

User Preferences

---

• Participants in a study rated different types of CAPTCHAs on a Likert scale

• Marked differences in preferences were observed, with average scores ranging from 2.76 to 3.94

Types of CAPTCHAs

---

• Masking and game-based CAPTCHAs appeared on multiple websites

• hCAPTCHA and invisible CAPTCHAs were also found

Scope of the Study

---

• The study focused on mainstream websites and excluded special-purpose CAPTCHAs

• Results represent a lower bound and may change over time

Distorted Text CAPTCHAs

---

• Researchers set up their own server to serve distorted text CAPTCHAs

• 1,000 unique distorted text CAPTCHAs were downloaded and stored

Contextualized Settings

---

• Confounding factors may have affected the comparison between direct and contextualized settings in the study

• Compensation and perceived benefit of completing the task could have influenced participant focus

Solving Time vs Preference

---

• Participants preferred CAPTCHAs with lower solving times

• Game-based and slider-based CAPTCHAs received high preference scores despite longer solving times

Accuracy and Abandonment Rates

---

• Difficulty level did not significantly impact the accuracy of image classification in reCAPTCHA

• Accuracy rates were 81% and 81.7% on different difficulty levels

Game-based CAPTCHAs

---

• Game-based CAPTCHAs, like senCAPTCHA, are generally preferred over text and image-based CAPTCHAs

• Distorted text CAPTCHAs had solving times ranging from 9 to 15 seconds

References and Sources

---

• A list of references and links related to CAPTCHAs and internet measurement activities

• Guidelines, surveys, and studies on CAPTCHAs’ vulnerabilities and breaking techniques

Key Takeaways

---

• CAPTCHAs have evolved with advancements in computer vision and machine learning

• User preferences for CAPTCHAs vary significantly

• Different types of CAPTCHAs are used on various websites

• Participants prefer CAPTCHAs with lower solving times, but game-based CAPTCHAs are also popular

• Difficulty level does not significantly impact the accuracy of image classification in reCAPTCHA

• Game-based CAPTCHAs are generally preferred over text and image-based ones

• Various studies evaluate the effectiveness and vulnerabilities of CAPTCHAs

---

Note: Visuals such as examples of different CAPTCHA types, graphs comparing solving times, or screenshots of game-based CAPTCHAs can be included on relevant slides for visual appeal and better understanding.