Serving Thousands of Concurrent LoRA Adapters

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 11,501 words - view

S-LoRA: Empowering Scalable Serving

• S-LoRA efficiently serves LoRA adapters

• Minimizes fragmentation and surpasses other libraries in throughput

• Stores all adapters in main memory and fetches active adapters to GPU memory

[Visual: Diagram showing the flow of adapters from main memory to GPU memory]

Unified Paging for Efficient Memory Management

• Unified Paging reduces fragmentation

• Handles dynamic adapter weights and KV cache tensors effectively

• Allows for larger batch sizes and improved memory utilization

[Visual: Comparison graph showing reduced fragmentation with Unified Paging]

Tensor Parallelism and Optimized CUDA Kernels

• S-LoRA employs tensor parallelism strategy

• Optimized CUDA kernels support batched LoRA computations

• Enables efficient batched inference for LoRA

[Visual: Illustration showing tensor parallelism strategy]

Outperforming State-of-the-Art Libraries

• S-LoRA outperforms HuggingFace PEFT and vLLM in throughput

• Improves throughput by up to 4 times

• Increases the number of served adapters significantly

[Visual: Bar chart comparing throughput of S-LoRA with other libraries]

Consistently Demonstrating Superior Performance

• S-LoRA’s performance evaluated on synthetic and real production workloads

• Consistently demonstrates superior performance compared to other systems

• High throughput and SLO attainment in serving real-world workloads

[Visual: Line graph showing S-LoRA’s performance compared to other systems]

Scalability with Tensor Parallelism Strategy

• S-LoRA’s tensor parallelism strategy supports multi-GPU inference

• Minimal communication and memory overheads

• Increased serving throughput with additional GPUs

[Visual: Diagram showing scalability with increasing number of GPUs]

On-the-Fly Computation for High Performance

• Ablation study comparing S-LoRA’s on-the-fly computation with merging approach

• On-the-fly computation maintains high performance with multiple adapters

• Merging approach declines in performance with more than 2 adapters

[Visual: Comparison table showing performance of different approaches]

Early Abort Strategy for Efficient Serving

• Ablation study comparing S-LoRA’s early abort strategy with FCFS and LCFS

• Early abort strategy outperforms FCFS and LCFS, especially with higher cv

• Ensures efficient serving even under varying conditions

[Visual: Comparison graph showing performance of different strategies]

Advancements in LLM Serving

• Related work highlights the significance of transformer architecture

• Systems like PetS, Clipper, TensorFlow Serving, and Nexus have made advancements

• S-LoRA addresses the auto-regressive characteristics and parameter-efficient adapters in LLM serving

[Visual: Collage of logos representing related work systems]

Conclusion - Highly Efficient Serving with S-LoRA

• S-LoRA is a highly efficient system for serving thousands of LoRA adapters

• Innovative design strategies enable large-scale fine-tuning services

• Scalable, high throughput, and suitable for diverse requirements

[Visual: Image representing efficiency and scalability]

S-LoRA: Empowering Scalable Serving

• S-LoRA efficiently serves LoRA adapters with high throughput

• Minimizes fragmentation and utilizes innovative design strategies

• A groundbreaking system for deploying large language models tailored to diverse requirements

Designing Domain Specific Languages: A Guide to Success

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 7,037 words - view

Introduction

• Designing a new domain specific language (DSL) can be complex and time-consuming.

• Existing tool support for DSL design focuses on technical aspects but lacks support for enforcing principles for good language design.

• Guidelines for designing DSLs should be based on experience in developing languages and existing guidelines for general purpose and modeling languages.

Identify the Purpose of the Language

• Identify the uses of the language early on, such as documentation, code generation, testing, verification, analysis, or simulation.

• Determining the uses helps determine the concepts and features that the language should include.

Visual: Image illustrating different uses of DSLs

Reflect Only Necessary Domain Concepts

• Reflect only the necessary domain concepts in the language.

• Keep the language simple and avoid unnecessary generality.

• Limit the number of language elements and avoid redundancy.

Visual: Graph showing the relationship between simplicity and effectiveness in DSL design

Adopt Existing Notations Used by Domain Experts

• Adopt existing notations used by domain experts whenever possible.

• Descriptive notations and distinguishable representations of language elements contribute to understandability.

• Appropriate use of syntactic sugar can improve readability, but avoid overuse.

Visual: Examples of existing notations used in different domains

Align Concrete and Abstract Syntax

• The concrete syntax of the language should align closely with the abstract syntax.

• This alignment eases automated processing and presentation.

• A good layout of the model should not affect its meaning.

Visual: Diagram showing the alignment between concrete and abstract syntax

Consider Project-Specific Requirements and Constraints

• Consider project-specific requirements and constraints when designing DSLs.

• Size of language instances, intended usage, and costs may influence design decisions.

• The decision to reuse existing languages or implement a new one is important.

Visual: Comparison table highlighting the factors to consider in DSL design

Conclusion

• These guidelines provide a basis for designing DSLs, but they are not exhaustive.

• Guidelines may need to be extended or updated over time.

• Consider the specific requirements and constraints of each project when applying these guidelines.

Visual: Image representing the iterative nature of DSL design

Key Takeaways

• Designing a DSL requires considering the purpose, simplicity, and necessary domain concepts.

• Adopt existing notations and align concrete and abstract syntax for improved understandability.

• Project-specific requirements and constraints play a crucial role in DSL design.

• Reusing existing languages or implementing new ones should be carefully evaluated.

• Remember to apply these guidelines while considering the unique aspects of each project.

Pretraining Data Mixtures for Transformer Models: Unleashing the Power of In-Context Learning

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 6,003 words - view

Introduction

• Transformer models can learn new tasks without explicit training through in-context learning (ICL)

• Pretraining data plays a crucial role in enabling few-shot learning capabilities

• Transformers demonstrate near-optimal unsupervised model selection capabilities with well-represented task families in pretraining data

In-Context Learning with Transformers

• Transformers can learn high-dimensional and non-linear functions from in-context examples

• Impressive few-shot learning capabilities allow transformers to perform tasks in-context

• Previous work showcases transformers’ ability to learn from examples and generate responses

The Importance of Pretraining Data

• Pretraining data mixture composition affects the few-shot learning abilities of transformers

• Study focuses on transformers trained on sequences of (x, f(x)) pairs rather than natural language

• Results show near-optimal unsupervised model selection capabilities when task families are well-represented in pretraining data

Limitations of Transformers

• Transformers exhibit various failure modes and a degradation of generalization when presented with tasks outside of pretraining data

• In-context learning behavior does not generalize well beyond pretraining data

• Model’s predictions deviate when presented with functions not part of any single component function class

In-Context Learning Setup

• Few-shot learning setup with a small number of inputs and labels compared to pretraining data

• Examples passed sequentially, alternating between inputs and labels

• Test input treated as the final element, and model’s prediction for the next item considered as the predicted label

Model Selection during In-Context Learning

• Transformers can perform model selection among pretrained function classes during in-context learning at little extra statistical cost

• Results indicate that model can perform model selection among pretrained function classes

• Model’s in-context learning behavior is relatively uniform with respect to the number of in-context examples provided

Transformer as a Sequence Model

• Transformers are sequence models that provide next-token predictions conditional on previous sequence tokens

• Data-generating model uses normal distribution for covariates and distribution over function classes for functions

• In-context learning problem framed as providing a single prompt sequence and generating a prediction for the next token

Training Process and Data Generation

• Model trained on sequences of (x, f(x)) pairs drawn from different function classes

• Data generation process for each function class explained, including dense linear functions, sparse linear functions, two-layer ReLU networks, and sinusoidal functions

• Pretraining involves mixture of these function classes and normalization of each function class

Model Selection Behavior of Transformers

• Model pretrained on a mixture of linear functions and sinusoids performs similarly to models pretrained on only one function class

• In-context learning behavior relatively uniform with respect to the number of in-context examples provided

• Deviations in model’s predictions when presented with functions outside specific function classes

Conclusion

• Transformer models have the ability to perform in-context learning and learn new tasks without explicit training

• Pretraining data is crucial for enabling few-shot learning capabilities

• Transformers demonstrate near-optimal unsupervised model selection capabilities with well-represented task families

• However, transformers exhibit failure modes and a degradation of generalization when presented with tasks outside pretraining data

• In-context learning behavior does not generalize well beyond pretraining data

Harnessing the Power of In-Context Learning with Pretraining Data Mixtures

• Pretraining data mixtures enable transformers to adapt to new tasks through in-context learning

• Leveraging the power of transformer models can revolutionize task learning and adaptation in various domains

• Remember: Pretraining data composition and representation play a critical role in achieving optimal performance

ChipNeMo Domain-Adapted LLMs for Chip Design

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 12,368 words - view

Introduction

• ChipNeMo explores domain adaptation techniques for chip design tasks

• Customized LLMs enhance performance and enable the use of compact models

• Recommendations for training approaches and methods

[Visual: Image of a computer chip]

Domain Adaptation Techniques

• Custom tokenizers improve tokenization efficiency

• Domain-adaptive pretraining on a large corpus of chip design data

• Supervised fine-tuning with domain-specific instructions

[Visual: Graph showing performance improvement with domain adaptation]

Engineering Assistant Chatbot

• Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) for more accurate answers

• Domain-adapted retrieval model improves answer quality

• Assists design engineers with architecture, design, verification, and build questions

EDA Script Generation

• ChipNeMo models outperform base models for script generation

• Training using tool-specific and custom internal script libraries

• Generates scripts for design editing and analysis tasks

Bug Summarization and Analysis

• ChipNeMo models perform well in summarizing and analyzing bugs

• Training using bug data and human-curated context

• Domain-adapted models achieve higher scores than base models

Agent-Based Design Methodologies

• LLMs as reasoning engines for verification and optimization in chip design

• Potential for automating various language-related chip design tasks

• Use of domain-adapted LLMs to choose a sequence of actions

Importance of Domain Data

• Availability of domain data crucial for domain adaptation

• Larger corporations with internal documents and code have an advantage

• Two approaches for training domain-specific LLMs: from scratch or domain-adaptive pretraining

Performance Gap and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)

• RAG improves LLM performance in knowledge-intensive tasks

• Sparse retrieval methods and off-the-shelf general-purpose retrievers

• Bridging the performance gap between LLMs and human experts

Evaluation and Model Performance

• Domain-adapted LLMs achieve similar or better results compared to base models

• Importance of domain-specific fine-tuning and hyperparameter selection

• Examples of questions and answers for different chip design tasks

Future Improvements and Conclusion

• Larger base models and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF)

• Potential for agent-based design methodologies in chip design

• Acknowledgment of contributions and support from individuals and teams

Enhancing Chip Design with Domain-Adapted LLMs

• Domain adaptation techniques improve LLM performance in chip design tasks

• Customized models enable the use of compact models without sacrificing performance

• Further research and development will bridge the gap between current results and ideal outcomes

Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 12,099 words - view

Introduction

• The FheFL algorithm addresses privacy and poisoning attacks in federated learning (FL)

• FheFL utilizes fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) to protect model updates and prevent private information inference

• Non-poisoning rate-based aggregation scheme effectively addresses data poisoning attacks

FHE for Privacy in FL

• FHE ensures privacy by encrypting model updates using the CKKS FHE scheme

• Computation on encrypted data allows for secure aggregation

• Server calculates Euclidean distance in the encrypted domain to determine non-poisoning rate

Multi-Key HE Scheme for Secure Aggregation

• Multi-key HE scheme used for aggregating encrypted model updates from all users

• Aggregated model decrypted using shared secret keys

• Non-poisoning rate-based aggregation scheme minimizes influence of malicious users

Security of Multi-Key HE Scheme

• Security of multi-key HE scheme equivalent to FHE schemes

• Privacy protection if at least two non-colluding users exist

Convergence Analysis

• Non-poisoning rate-based weighted aggregation converges to benign users’ only model

• Training loss decreases with each epoch when percentage of attackers is small

Experimental Analysis

• FheFL outperforms other aggregation schemes in accuracy and robustness against data poisoning attacks

• Computational complexity comparable to other state-of-the-art schemes

• Reasonable bandwidth requirement for communication between users and server

Conclusion

• FheFL ensures privacy and security in federated learning

• Non-poisoning rate-based aggregation scheme mitigates data poisoning attacks

• Comparable accuracy with reasonable computational and communication complexity

Key Takeaways

• FheFL algorithm addresses privacy and poisoning attacks in FL using FHE

• Multi-key HE scheme ensures secure aggregation of model updates

• Non-poisoning rate-based aggregation scheme minimizes influence of malicious users

• FheFL offers comparable accuracy with reasonable computational and communication complexity

• Overall, FheFL sets the stage for advancements in privacy-preserving federated learning.