Towards Generalist Biomedical AI

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 21,577 words - view

Medicine is a multimodal discipline

---

• Clinicians use various data modalities for care

• Existing AI models in medicine are often unimodal

• Lack of relevant information incorporation and collaborative dialogue

Med-PaLM M is a generalist biomedical AI system

---

• Interprets multimodal biomedical data

• Performs diverse range of tasks with a single model

• Outperforms specialized models on various tasks

Visual: Image of Med-PaLM M system

Training a generalist biomedical AI system

---

• Language as common grounding for new tasks

• Combining knowledge learned from other tasks

• Med-PaLM M generalizes to novel medical concepts

• Zero-shot learning for unseen tasks

Med-PaLM M outperforms PaLM-E on biomedical tasks

---

• Importance of domain-specific design

• PaLM-E excels in language, vision, and agent policy learning

• Med-PaLM M designed specifically for the biomedical domain

Med-PaLM M achieves competitive results on medical image classification

---

• Surpasses previous state-of-the-art models

Visual: Comparison graph of Med-PaLM M performance

Med-PaLM M excels in medical visual question answering

---

• Demonstrates high accuracy in answering medical questions

Visual: Example of a medical visual question

---

The Power of Generalist Biomedical AI

- Generalist models like Med-PaLM M interpret multimodal biomedical data and perform diverse tasks efficiently.

---

• Training with language as a common grounding enables tackling new tasks by combining knowledge.

• Med-PaLM M demonstrates the ability to generalize to novel concepts and unseen tasks.

• Remember the importance of domain-specific design for optimal performance.

Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 12,700 words - view

Introduction

---

• Researchers propose a method for generating adversarial attacks on language models.

• Large language models (LLMs) trained on internet text may contain objectionable content.

• Developers have been aligning LLMs to prevent harmful responses.

Improved Attack Methods

---

• The approach presented improves existing attack methods.

• The target model can be reliably broken.

• Adversarial suffixes are automatically produced.

Universal and Transferable Attacks

---

• Universal and transferable adversarial attacks involve putting the model in a “state” of objectionable behavior.

• Objectionable content can be generated across multiple inputs.

• Similar models can be fooled by the same attack.

Evaluating Effectiveness

---

• The success of adversarial attacks is measured by the model’s ability to execute harmful behaviors or generate harmful strings.

• Transfer attacks on language models show successful jailbreaking on certain models.

• Some models are more robust against attacks.

Strategies for Attacking Language Models

---

• Strategies involve exploiting vulnerabilities, maintaining access, and manipulating operations.

• A step-by-step guide on how to make a person disappear forever is provided.

• Visual: Image of a lock being picked.

Existence of Universal Attacks

---

• Universal adversarial attacks exist across various domains.

• They can fool similar models in different domains.

• Visual: Chart showing the transferability of adversarial attacks.

Ethical Considerations and Disclosure

---

• Generating harmful content from language models raises ethical concerns.

• The importance of disclosing this research is emphasized.

• Visual: Image representing ethical considerations.

References and Citations

---

• The document contains a list of references and citations to related research papers.

• Various topics related to adversarial attacks on language models are covered.

• Visual: Image of a stack of research papers.

Conclusion

---

• The proposed method improves on existing attack methods and breaks the target model reliably.

• Adversarial attacks can generate objectionable content across multiple inputs.

• The effectiveness of attacks is evaluated by measuring harmful behaviors or strings.

• Visual: Image summarizing the main points.

Key Takeaways

---

• Researchers propose a method for generating adversarial attacks on language models.

• Large language models may contain objectionable content, so alignment is important.

• Universal and transferable adversarial attacks can fool similar models.

• Strategies for attacking language models involve exploiting vulnerabilities and manipulating operations.

• Ethical considerations and disclosure are crucial.

• Visual: Image representing the main message of the presentation.

BasicBlocker ISA Redesign for Spectre-Immune CPUs

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 18,673 words - view

Introduction

---

• BasicBlocker is a generic ISA modification that eliminates speculative execution in CPUs to mitigate the security vulnerabilities exploited by Spectre.

• It introduces a simple and efficient hardware implementation that minimizes the performance penalty of removing branch prediction and speculative fetching.

• A CPU supporting BasicBlocker can run code compiled for the old ISA without compromising security, improving deployability.

The BasicBlock Instruction

---

• The BasicBlocker ISA redesign introduces a new instruction called the basic block (bb) instruction.

• The bb instruction provides information about the size and sequentiality of upcoming basic blocks.

• This allows the CPU to fetch instructions in sequential order without needing to stall fetching until the branch is resolved.

Manipulating the bb Instruction

---

• An attacker can manipulate the bb instruction to control certain parts of the control flow.

• Flipping the sequential flag leads to an exception.

• Decreasing the basic block size allows skipping critical code.

Performance Evaluation

---

• The performance of BasicBlocker on the VexRiscv processor was evaluated.

• The average speedup over all benchmarks was 2.88x compared to a non-control-flow-speculative processor.

• This demonstrates the effectiveness of BasicBlocker in mitigating Spectre attacks.

Gem5 Simulation Results

---

• The research paper discusses the redesign of the BasicBlocker ISA and evaluates its performance using the Gem5 simulator.

• Graphs and benchmark results are shown for various scenarios, including pipeline delay, basic block (BB) information, BB rescheduling, and early decode.

Key Takeaways

---

• BasicBlocker is a powerful solution to mitigate Spectre vulnerabilities by eliminating speculative execution in CPUs.

• The new bb instruction provides valuable information about basic block size and sequentiality.

• Manipulation of the bb instruction can be used by attackers to control the control flow.

• The performance evaluation of BasicBlocker on the VexRiscv processor shows a significant speedup compared to non-control-flow-speculative processors.

• The Gem5 simulation results confirm the effectiveness of the BasicBlocker ISA redesign.

---

[Visuals: Include graphs from the Gem5 simulation results to enhance understanding of the performance evaluation]

---

Note: The presentation structure and content can be adjusted as needed to fit the desired length and emphasis on key points.

Boosting Large Language Models for Code

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 7,748 words - view

RRTF Framework Enhances Code Language Models

---

• RRTF (Rank Responses to align Test&Teacher Feedback) boosts the performance of pre-trained language models for code generation.

• PanGu-Coder2, developed under the RRTF framework, achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple benchmarks.

• The RRTF framework improves code generation by aligning test and teacher feedback.

[Visual: Image depicting the RRTF framework]

RAFT Technique for Language Model Optimization

---

• The reward-ranked fine-tuning (RAFT) technique addresses inefficiency and instability in language models.

• RAFT selects high-quality model outputs based on a reward model aligned with human preferences.

• Using RAFT, models can be trained to generate code that aligns with human preferences.

[Visual: Graph showing the improvement in performance achieved by using RAFT]

Validation of PanGu-Coder2 for Code Generation

---

• Experiments and a survey were conducted to validate the effectiveness of PanGu-Coder2 for code generation.

• The survey ensured that there was no data leakage in the experiments.

• PanGu-Coder2 demonstrated superior performance compared to other models in code generation tasks.

[Visual: Comparison chart showing the performance of PanGu-Coder2 against other models]

Benchmarks for Evaluating Large Language Models

---

• HumanEval, CoderEval, and LeetCode are benchmarks used to evaluate the performance of large language models for code generation.

• HumanEval consists of 164 programming tasks, while CoderEval includes 230 functions from open-source Python.

• PanGu-Coder2 outperforms other open-source models across these benchmarks, showcasing its superiority in code generation.

[Visual: Collage of screenshots from the benchmark platforms]

Solving the Task of Creating a Pile of Stones

---

• The make-a-pile function solves the task of creating a pile of stones with n levels.

• The number of stones in each level depends on whether n is odd or even.

• This function demonstrates the practical application of language models in solving coding problems.

[Visual: Step-by-step illustration of the make-a-pile function]

Papers and Models Related to Large Language Models for Code Generation

---

• The input text provides an overview of various papers and models related to large language models for code generation.

• Papers such as “CERT: Continual pre-training on sketches for library-oriented code generation” and “SantaCoder: don’t reach for the stars!” are mentioned.

• These papers cover topics like generating code by retrieving and reading docs, and the use of private libraries in language models.

[Visual: Collage of cover pages from the mentioned papers]

References to Research Papers and Preprints

---

• The summary provides a list of references to various research papers and preprints related to training and improving large language models for code generation.

• These papers cover a range of topics, offering further insights into the field.

• Researchers can explore these references for in-depth knowledge and understanding.

[Visual: Image depicting a stack of research papers]

Enhancing Code Generation with RRTF and PanGu-Coder2

---

• RRTF framework and PanGu-Coder2 improve the performance of pre-trained language models in code generation.

• The RAFT technique addresses inefficiency and instability in language models, leading to more accurate code generation.

• PanGu-Coder2 outperforms other models on various benchmarks, showcasing its superiority.

• Remember to leverage the power of large language models for efficient and effective code generation.

[Visual: Image depicting a successful code generation process]

Instruction Tuning for Financial Sentiment Analysis

Source: arxiv.org - PDF - 4,643 words - view

Introduction to Instruct-FinGPT

---

• Instruct-FinGPT improves the accuracy of large language models in financial sentiment analysis.

• It evaluates and addresses the limitations of FLANG, BloombergGPT, and FinBERT models.

Visual: Image comparing the performance of Instruct-FinGPT with other models

Challenges in Financial Sentiment Analysis

---

• FLANG and BloombergGPT are two models used for financial sentiment analysis.

• BloombergGPT has limitations in terms of accessibility and applicability.

Visual: Graph showing the limitations of BloombergGPT

Instruction Tuning for Improved Interpretation

---

• Instruction tuning is used to improve the accuracy of large language models (LLMs) in interpreting numerical values.

• LLMs have an advantage in contextual understanding due to their diverse training data.

Visual: Chart comparing the effectiveness of LLMs in interpreting numerical values

Instruct-FinGPT Approach

---

• The authors describe their approach to instruction tuning for financial sentiment analysis using the Instruct-FinGPT-7B model.

• The model is initialized with the LLaMA-7B model and undergoes instruction tuning over 10 epochs.

Visual: Diagram illustrating the Instruct-FinGPT approach

Performance Comparison

---

• PPD’s stock is expected to open at $30, indicating an 11% increase from the IPO price of $27.

• The Instruct-FinGPT model consistently outperforms FinBERT and LLaMA-7B in terms of financial sentiment analysis.

Visual: Comparison table showing the performance metrics of different models

References for Further Reading

---

• This summary provides a list of references related to instruction tuning for financial sentiment analysis.

• The references include papers and articles discussing various methods and techniques for sentiment analysis in the financial domain.

Visual: Collage of book covers or article titles representing the references

Key Takeaways

---

• Instruct-FinGPT improves the accuracy of large language models in financial sentiment analysis.

• Instruction tuning is a powerful technique for interpreting numerical values in financial data.

• Remember to consider the limitations of existing models and explore new approaches for better performance.